| 1. | To elect the three (3) Class III directors named in the proxy statement to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors until the 20202023 annual meeting of stockholders.stockholders; |
| 2. | To ratify the selection, by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.2020; |
| 3. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the proxy statement; and |
| 3.4. | To conduct any other business properly brought before the meeting. |
These items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this Notice. OurThe Company’s Board of Directors urges you to read the accompanying proxy statement carefully and recommends the approval of each of the proposals, which are more fully described in the proxy statement.
The record date for the annual meeting is April 24, 2017.13, 2020. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date may vote at the annual meeting or any adjournment thereof. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2017 Annual Meeting2020 annual meeting of Stockholders to Be be
Held on June 22, 201710, 2020. Information for attending the annual meeting is available at the Marriot Hotel, 1 Burlington Mall Road, Burlington, MA 01803.www.proxydocs.com/FLXN. The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available free of charge at: www.proxydocs.com/flxn.FLXN. | | | By Order of the Board of Directors 
| | /s/ Michael D. Clayman, M.D.
| Michael D. Clayman, M.D.Mark S. Levine | President and Chief Executive OfficerCorporate Secretary |
Burlington, MA April 28, 201729, 2020 You are cordially invited to attend the virtual meeting. Your vote is important. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the virtual meeting, please vote by proxy over the telephone or through the internet as instructed in these materials, or using a proxy card that you may request or that we may elect to deliver at a later time, as promptly as possible, to ensure your representation at the meeting. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote online if you attend the virtual meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder in order to vote your shares that are held in such agent’s name and account. |
You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, please vote by proxy over the telephone or through the internet as instructed in these materials, or using a proxy card that you may request or that we may elect to deliver at a later time, as promptly as possible, in order to ensure your representation at the meeting. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote in person if you attend the meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder in order to vote your shares that are held in such agent’s name and account.
Table of ContentsContents—2020 Proxy Statement -i-
FLEXION THERAPEUTICS, INC. 10 Mall Road, Suite 301
Burlington, MA 01803
PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 20172020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To be held on June 10, 2020 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THESE PROXY MATERIALS AND VOTINGQuestions and Answers About These Proxy Materials and Voting
Why did I receive a notice regarding the availability of proxy materials on the internet? Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the internet. Accordingly, we have sent you a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) because the Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors,” “Board” or “our Board”) of Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or “Flexion”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting2020 annual meeting of Stockholders,stockholders, including at any adjournments or postponements of the meeting. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. Please note that, while our proxy materials are available at the website referenced in the Notice, and our Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this proxy statementProxy Statement and 20162019 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available on our website, no other information contained on either website is incorporated by reference in or considered to be a part of this document. Further, information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and references to our website address in this proxy statement are inactive textual references only. We intend to mail the Notice on or about April 28, 2017May 1, 2020 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Will I receive any other proxy materials by mail? We may send you a proxy card, along with a second Notice,notice, on or after May 8, 2017.12, 2020. How do I attend the annual meeting? The meetingWe will be held on Thursday,hosting the annual meeting only by means of a live webcast. There will not be a physical meeting location and you will not be able to attend the meeting in person. To participate in the annual meeting virtually via the internet, please visit www.proxydoc.com/FLXN prior to the meeting.
You must register by June 22, 20178, 2020 at 1:305:00 p.m. Eastern Time atto attend the Marriot Hotel, 1 Burlington Mall Road, Burlington, MA 01803.annual meeting webcast. DirectionsUpon properly completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique live meeting link that will allow you access to the annual meeting may be found at http://www.marriott.com/hotels/maps/travel/bosbu-boston-marriott-burlington/#directions. Information on howand will permit you to vote in person atsubmit questions before and during the annual meeting is discussed below.and vote.
Who can vote at the annual meeting? Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 24, 201713, 2020 will be entitled to vote at the annual meeting. On this record date, there were 31,757,69238,562,504 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for examination at our principal executive offices at the address listed above for a period of 10 days prior to the annual meeting, and during the annual meeting such list will be available for examination at www.proxydoc.com/FLXN.
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name If on April 24, 2017,13, 2020, your shares were registered directly in your name with Flexion’s transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in personelectronically at the meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attendparticipate in the virtual meeting, we urge you to vote over the internet or by telephone, or by requesting and returning a proxy card, to ensure your vote is counted. Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank If on April 24, 2017,13, 2020, your shares were held not in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and the Notice is being forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered to be the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other agent regarding how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the virtual annual meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in personelectronically at the virtual meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from your broker or other agent. What am I voting on? There are twothree matters scheduled for a vote: Election of the three Class III directors named herein to serve on our Board until our 20202023 annual meeting of stockholders; andstockholders (Proposal 1); Ratification of the selection, by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.2020 (Proposal 2); and An advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal 3). What if another matter is properly brought before the meeting? The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxyherein to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment. How do I vote? YouFor the election of directors, you may either vote “For” all the nominees to the Board of Directors or you may “Withhold” your vote for any nominee you specify. For the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017,2020, you may vote “For” or “Against” or abstain from voting. For the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, you may vote “For” or “Against” or abstain from voting.
The procedures for voting are fairly simple: Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in personelectronically at the virtual annual meeting, vote by proxy over the telephone, vote by proxy through the internet or vote by proxy using a proxy card that you may request or that we may elect to deliver at a later time. Whether or not you plan to attendparticipate in the virtual meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the virtual meeting and vote in personelectronically at the meeting even if you have already voted by proxy. To vote at the virtual annual meeting, you must register in person, comeadvance at www.proxydocs.com/FLXN prior to the annualdeadline of June 8, 2020 at 5:00 pm Eastern Time. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice. Upon properly completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique live meeting link that will allow you access to the meeting and weyou will give you a ballot when you arrive.have the ability to vote electronically. To vote using the printed proxy card that may be mailed to you, simply complete, sign and date the proxy card that may be delivered and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the annual meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.
| • | To vote over the telephone, dial toll-free 1-866-291-6836 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice. Your telephone vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on June 9, 2020 to be counted. |
To vote over the telephone, dial toll-free 1-866-291-6836 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice. Your telephone vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on June 21, 2017 to be counted.
To vote through the internet, go to www.proxypush.com/flxnwww.proxydocs.com/FLXN to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice. Your internet vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on June 21, 2017 to be counted. Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should have received a Notice containing voting instructions from that organization rather than from Flexion. Simply follow the voting instructions in the Notice to ensure that your vote is counted. To vote in personelectronically at the annual meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker, bank or bankother agent included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker, bank or bankother agent to request a proxy form. Internet proxy voting is being provided to allow you to vote your shares online, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your internet access, such as usage charges from internet access providers and telephone companies. |
Internet proxy voting is being provided to allow you to vote your shares online, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your internet access, such as usage charges from internet access providers and telephone companies.
How many votes do I have? On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of common stock you own as of April 24, 2017.13, 2020. What happens if I do not vote? Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name If you are a stockholder of record and do not vote by completing your proxy card, by telephone, through the internet or in person atelectronically during the annual meeting, your shares will not be voted. Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank If you are a beneficial owner and do not instruct your broker, bank or other agent how to vote your shares, the question of whether your broker or nominee will still be able to vote your shares depends on whether the particular proposal is considered to be a routine matter under applicable rules. Brokers and nominees can use their discretion to vote “uninstructed” shares with respect to matters that are considered to be “routine” under applicable rules but not with respect to “non-routine” matters. Under applicable rules and interpretations, “non-routine” matters are matters that may substantially affect the rights or privileges of stockholders, such as mergers, stockholder proposals, elections of directors (even if not contested), executive compensation (including any advisory stockholder votes on executive compensation and on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation) and certain corporate governance proposals, even if management-supported. Accordingly, your broker or nominee may not vote your shares on ProposalProposals 1 or 3 without your instructions but may vote your shares on Proposal 2 even in the absence of your instruction. What if I return a proxy card or otherwise vote but do not make specific choices? If you return a signed and dated proxy card or otherwise vote without marking voting selections, your shares will be voted, as applicable, “For” the election of allthree nominees for director named in this proxy statement andstatement; “For” the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.2020; and “For” the approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. If any other matter is properly presented at the meeting, your proxyholder (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his or her best judgment. Who is paying for this proxy solicitation? We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.
What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice? If you receive more than one Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on the Notices to ensure that all of your shares are voted. Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy? Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name Yes. You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares, you may revoke your proxy in any one of the following ways: You may submit another properly completed proxy card with a later date (which automatically revokes your earlier proxy). You may grant a subsequent proxy by telephone or through the internet. You may send a timely written notice that you are revoking your proxy to Flexion’s Corporate Secretary at 10 Mall Road, Suite 301, Burlington, MA 01803. You may attend the virtual annual meeting and submit your vote in person.electronically at that time. Simply attending the meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy. Your most current proxy card or telephone or internet proxy is the one that is counted. Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank If your shares are held by your broker or bank as a nominee or agent, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker or bank. When are stockholder proposals and director nominations due for next year’s annual meeting? To be considered for inclusion in next year’s proxy materials, your proposal (including a director nomination) must be submitted in writing by December 29, 2017,January 1, 2021, to the attention of the Corporate Secretary of Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. at 10 Mall Road, Suite 301, Burlington, MA 01803. If you wish to submit a proposal (including a director nomination) at the 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders that is not to be included in next year’s proxy materials, you must do so between February 15, 201810, 2021 and March 17, 2018.12, 2021. You are also advised to review Flexion’s amended and restated bylaws (the “Bylaws”), which contain additional requirements about advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations. How are votes counted? Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the meeting, who will separately count, (i) for the proposalProposal 1 to elect directors, votes “For,” “Withhold” and broker non-votes, and, with respect(ii) for Proposal 2 to the ratification ofratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, votes “For” and “Against,” abstentions and if applicable, broker non-votes.non-votes, and (iii) for Proposal 3, the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, votes “For” and “Against” and abstentions. Broker non-votes on Proposals 1 and 3 will have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for any of these proposals. What are “broker non-votes”? As discussed above, when a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” does not give instructions to the broker or nominee holding the shares as to how to vote on matters deemed to be “non-routine,” the broker or nominee cannot vote the shares. These unvoted shares are counted as “broker non-votes.” Proposals 1 and 3 are considered to be “non-routine” under applicable rules and we therefore expect broker non-votes to exist in connection with those proposals.
How many votes are needed to approve each proposal? For Proposal 1,The following table summarizes the electionminimum vote needed to approve each proposal and the effect of directors, the three nominees receiving the most “For” votes from the holders of shares present in person or represented by proxyabstentions and entitled to vote on the election of directors will be elected. Only votes “For” nominees will affect the outcome.broker non-votes.
To be approved, Proposal 2, ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, must receive “For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter. If you “Abstain” from voting, it will have the same effect as an “Against” vote. Broker non-votes will have no effect.
Proposal Number | | Proposal Description | | Vote Required for Approval | | Effect of Abstentions | | Effect of Broker Non-Votes | | | | | | | | | | 1 | | Election of directors | | The three nominees receiving the most “For” votes | | Not Applicable | | None | 2 | | Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 | | “For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter | | Against | | Not Applicable | 3 | | Advisory approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers | | “For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter | | Against | | None |
What is the quorum requirement? A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if stockholders holding at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote are present at the virtual meeting in person or represented by proxy. On April 13, 2020, the record date, there were 31,757,69238,562,504 shares outstanding and entitled to vote.Thus, the holders ofat least 15,878,84719,281,253 shares must be present in personat the virtual meeting or represented by proxy at the virtual meeting to have a quorum. Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or one is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or other nominee) or if you vote in personelectronically at the virtual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, the chairman of the meeting or the holders of a majority of shares present at the virtual meeting in person or represented by proxy may adjourn the meeting to another date. How can I find out the results of the voting at the annual meeting? Preliminary voting results will be announced at the annual meeting. In addition, final voting results will be published in a current report on Form 8-K that we expect to file within four business days after the annual meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Form 8-K within four business days after the annual meeting, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an additional Form 8-K to publish the final results.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSForward-Looking Statements
This proxy statement contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, relating to future events. Such statements are only predictions and involve risks and uncertainties, resulting in the possibility that the actual events or performance will differ materially from such predictions. For a nonexclusive list of major factors which could cause the actual results to differ materially from the predicted results in the forward looking statements, please refer to the “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162019 and in our periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K.
PROPOSALProposal 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORSElection of Directors
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our directors, including their ages as of the date of the annual meeting: | | | | | | | | | CLASS Class
| | NAMEName
| | AGE | | | POSITION HELD WITHTHE COMPANYAge
| | | Position Held With the Company | I | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. | | | 6568 | | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | I | | Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M. | | | 5255 | | | Director | I | | Ann Merrifield | | | 6669 | | | Director | II | | Scott A. Canute | | | 5659 | | | Director | II | | Samuel D. Colella | | | 7780 | | | Director | II | | Mark Stejbach | | | 5357 | | | Director | III | | Heath Lukatch, Ph.D. | | | 5053 | | | Director | III | | Patrick J. Mahaffy | | | 5457 | | | Chairman of the Board of Directorsand Director | III | | Alan W. Milinazzo | | | 5760 | | | Director |
Classified Board The Company’s Board of Directors currently has nine members divided into three classes. Each class consists as nearly as possible, of one-third of the total number of directors and each class has a three-year term. Vacancies on the Board may be filled only by persons elected by a majority of the remaining directors. A director elected by the Board to fill a vacancy in a class, including vacancies created by an increase in the number of directors, shall serve for the remainder of the full term of that class and until the director’s successor is duly elected and qualified. There are three directors in Class III, the class whose term of office expires in 2017.2020. Each of the nominees listed below areis currently serving as a director of the Company and was previously elected by our stockholders. If elected at the annual meeting, each of these nominees would serve until the 20202023 annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, or, if sooner, until the director’s death, resignation or removal. It is the Company’s policy to encourage its directors and nominees for director to attend the annual meeting. All of our directorsDr. Clayman, Mr. Colella, Dr. Lukatch, Mr. Mahaffy, Mr. Mahatme, Ms. Merrifield, Mr. Milinazzo and Mr. Stejbach attended the Company’s 20162019 annual meeting of stockholders. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes of the holders of shares present in personat the virtual meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Accordingly, the three nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes will be elected. Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of the three nominees named below. If any nominee becomes unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, shares that would have been voted for that nominee will instead will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee proposed by the Company. Each person nominated for election has agreed to serve if elected. The Company’s management has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve. The following is a brief biography of each nominee for director and each director whose term will continue after the annual meeting.meeting: CLASSClass III DIRECTOR NOMINEESFOR ELECTIONFORA THREE-YEAR TERM EXPIRINGATTHE 2020 ANNUAL MEETINGDirector Nominees for the Election for Three-Year Term Expiring at the 2023 Annual Meeting
Heath Lukatch, Ph.D. has served as one of our directors since 2012. Dr. Lukatch is the Founder and Managing Partner of Red Tree Venture Capital. He currently serves as the Chairman of the board of directors at Inogen, Inc. and Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., both publicly traded companies, and as Chairman of Engage Therapeutics, Inc. a private biopharmaceutical company. He also currently serves as a board member at Adynxx, Inc., Halo Neuroscience Inc., SutroVax Inc., Ceribell Inc., ViaCyte, Inc. and ViewPoint Therapeutics, Inc. Previously, Dr. Lukatch was a Partner and Managing Director at TPG Biotech, a life science venture investment firm. From 2006 untilCapital from 2015 through March 2020. Prior to joining TPG in 2015, Dr. Lukatch was a Partner at Novo Ventures (US) Inc., which provides certain consultancy services toVentures. During his nine years at Novo, A/S, a Danish limited liability company that manages investments and financial assets. Dr. Lukatch joined Novo Ventures (US) Inc. in 2006. He currently servesserved as Chairman of theCianna Medical, Inc. (acquired by Merit Medical Systems Inc. in 2018), Inogen, NTP, Inc. and Spinifex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (acquired by Novartis International AG in 2015), as a board of directors of Inogen, Inc., a publicly traded medical technology company. Previously he was a member of the board of directors of a number of private companies, including Amira Pharmaceuticals Inc. (acquired by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company in 2011), AnaptysBio, Inc., Cianna Medical, Inc., Elevation Pharmaceuticals Inc. (acquired by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 2012), FoldRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (acquired by Pfizer, Inc. in 2010), InSound Medical, Inc. (acquired by Sonova USA Inc. in 2010), Spinifex,Nora Therapeutics Inc. and Synosia Therapeutics AG (acquired by BioTie Therapies Corp. in 2011) and he was also a board observer at Alios BioPharma Inc. (acquired by Johnson & Johnson Inc. in 2014), Dynavax Technologies Corp., Fluidigm Corporation and SI-Bone, Inc. Prior to joining Novo, Ventures (US) Inc., Dr. Lukatch was a Managing Director responsible for biotechnology venture investments at Piper Jaffray Ventures and SightLine Partners, a private equity firm and spin off of Piper Jaffray Ventures, from 2001 to 2006. Prior to joiningPartners. Before Piper Jaffray Ventures, Dr. Lukatch worked as a strategy consultant with McKinsey & Company, where he was a consulting firm.leader in McKinsey’s biotechnology practice. Dr. Lukatch also served as co-founder and Chief Executive OfficerCEO of AutoMate
Scientific, Inc., a biotechnology instrumentation company, and he has held scientific positions with Chiron Corporation, a biotechnology company, Inc., Roche Bioscience a healthcare company,Plc and Cetus Corporation, a biotechnology company.doing molecular biology, electrophysiology and protein chemistry, respectively. Dr. Lukatch received his Ph.D. in Neuroscience from Stanford University where he was a DOD USAFDepartment of Defense U.S. Air Force Fellow, and his B.A. with high honors in Biochemistry from the University of California at Berkeley. Our Board believes that his extensive industry experience, his experience with venture capital investments, and his experience of serving on the board of directors for several biopharmaceutical and healthcare companies qualifies Dr. Lukatch to serve on our Board of Directors.
Patrick J. Mahaffy has served as one of our directors and as Chairman of our Board since 2009. Mr. Mahaffy has served as the President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of Clovis Oncology, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, since 2009, and also serves2009. He served on the board of directors of Orexigen Therapeutics Inc., a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company.from 2009 until 2018. Previously, Mr. Mahaffy served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the board of directors at Pharmion Corporation, a pharmaceutical company that he founded in 2000 and sold to Celgene Corporation in 2008. From 1992 through 1998, Mr. Mahaffy was President and Chief Executive Officer of NeXagen, Inc. and its successor, NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. Prior to that, Mr. Mahaffy was a Vice President at the private equity firm E.M. Warburg Pincus and Co. He is also a trustee of Lewis and Clark College. Mr. Mahaffy earned a B.A. in international affairs from Lewis and Clark College and ana M.A. in international affairs from Columbia University. Our Board believes that Mr. Mahaffy’s experience and expertise in the pharmaceutical industry qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors. Alan W. Milinazzo has served as one of our directors since 2011. Mr. Milinazzo is a partner in the Global Healthcare and Life Sciences Practice at Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., a global executive search and leadership consulting firm, a position he has held since January 2016. Prior to then, fromFrom 2013 to 2016, he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors of InspireMD, Inc., a publicly traded medical device company. From 2006 to 2011, Mr. Milinazzo served as president and chief executive officer of Orthofix International, N.V., a publicly traded global orthopedic company, a position he was promoted to in 2006 after initially being hired as the company’s chief operating officer in 2005. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Milinazzo served as the General Manager of Medtronic, Inc.’s coronary and peripheral vascular businesses. He currently servesIn 2019, Mr. Milinazzo was appointed executive chairman of the board of directors of Opsens Inc. Mr. Milinazzo also formerly served on the board of directors of CAS Medical Systems, Inc. (CASMED), a publicly traded medical technology company. Mr. Milinazzo formerly served on the boards offrom 2013, until its acquisition by Edwards Life Sciences Corporation in 2019, LDR Holding Corporation, a publicly traded medical device company, from 2015 until its acquisition by Zimmer Biomet Holdings in June 2016, and on the board of directors of Orthofix International, N.V. from December 2006 until June 2012. HeMr. Milinazzo received his undergraduate degree from Boston College. Our Board of Directors believes that Mr. Milinazzo’s expertise in management and marketing in the pharmaceutical and medical device market and his 25 years of experience in the healthcare and life sciences sector qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH NAMED NOMINEE.The Board of Directors Recommends
a Vote “FOR” Each Named Nominee for Proposal 1
CLASSClass I DIRECTORS CONTINUINGIN OFFICE UNTILTHE 2018 ANNUAL MEETINGDirectors Continuing in Office Until the 2021 Annual Meeting
Michael D. Clayman, M.D. was is a co-founder and has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer and as one of our directors since our inception in 2007. Dr. Clayman also serves as the Chairman of the board of directors of both Anokion SA and Ribometrix Inc., both private biopharmaceutical companies. From 2014 to 2018, Dr. Clayman served on the board of directors of Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. and Anokion SA, each, a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company. Previously, Dr. Clayman had a lengthy career at Eli Lilly and Company, a global pharmaceutical company, where he was most recently Vice President, Lilly Research Laboratories, and General Manager of Chorus, Lilly’s early-phase development accelerator. During his career at Lilly, Dr. Clayman also led its Global Regulatory Affairs division, the Cardiovascular Discovery Research and Clinical Investigation, Research and Development at Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, a medical device subsidiary of Lilly, the Internal Medicine Division, the Lilly Clinic, Lilly’s dedicated Phase 1 unit, and served as Chair of Lilly’s Bioethics Committee. Prior to his tenure at Lilly, Dr. Clayman was an Assistant Professor in theSchool of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, where his research centered on the immunopathogenesis of renal disease. Dr. Clayman is the recipient of the Physician Scientist Award from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Clayman earned a B.A., cum laude, from Yale University and an M.D. from the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine. Following an internship and residency in Internal Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco Moffitt Hospitals, Dr. Clayman completed clinical and research fellowships in Nephrology at the University of Pennsylvania. Our Board believes that Dr. Clayman’s clinical and research experience, along with his more than 20 years of experience in pharmaceutical development, qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors. Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M. has served as one of our directors since 2014. Since November 2012, Mr. Mahatme has served as Senioris the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief FinancialBusiness Officer at Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company. Mr. Mahatme joined Sarepta in 2012. From January 2006 to November 2012, Mr. Mahatme worked at Celgene Corporation, a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company, where he served in various roles, including Senior Vice President of Corporate Development, Senior Vice President of Finance, Corporate Treasurer and Head of Tax. While at Celgene, Mr. Mahatme built the treasury and tax functions before establishing the Corporate Development Department, focused on strategic, targeted initiatives including commercial development in emerging markets, acquisitions, licensing and global manufacturing expansion. From 1997 to 2005 Mr. Mahatme worked for Pfizer Inc., a pharmaceutical company, where he served in senior roles in business development and corporate tax. Mr. Mahatme started his career at Ernst & Young LLP where he advised multinational corporations on a broad range of transactions. Mr. Mahatme also serves
on the board of directors of Aeglea Biotherapeutics,BioTherapeutics, Inc., a publicly traded biotechnologypublic company, focused on treatments for cancer and certain genetic diseases.Elcelyx Therapeutics, Inc., a private biopharmaceutical company. Mr. Mahatme earned LL.M. degrees from Cornell Law School and NYU School of Law and is a member of the New York State Bar Association. Our Board believes that Mr. Mahatme’s financial expertise qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors. Ann Merrifield has served as one of our directors since 2014. From December 2012 to July 2014, Ms. Merrifield served as President and Chief Executive Officer of PathoGenetix, Inc., a privately held health technologygenomics company, which voluntarily filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in July 2014. Prior to joining PathoGenetix, Inc., Ms. Merrifield served an 18-year tenure at Genzyme Corporation (now owned by Sanofi S.A.), a diversified, global biotechnology company. At Genzyme, Ms. Merrifield served most recentlyin a number of leadership roles, including as President of Genzyme Biosurgery, where she led global business strategy across a portfolio of biologics, therapeutic devices and combination products, and was previously Vice President of Marketing, General Manager andas President of Genzyme Genetics, where she played an instrumental role in developing and shaping itsthis diagnostic business. Prior to joining Genzyme, Ms. Merrifield was a Partner at Bain and Company, a global strategy consulting firm, and an Investment Officer at Aetna Life & Casualty. She currently serves as a directorthe Chair of the board of directors of InVivo Therapeutics Holdings Corp. and Juniper Pharmaceuticals, Inc., bothCorporation, a publicly traded biotechnology companies,company, and a member of the board of directors of Lyra Therapeutics, Inc., a private company, since 2019. Ms. Merrifield also serves as a trustee of MassMutual Premier, Select and MML Series Investment Funds. Previously, Ms. Merrifield served as a director of Juniper Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a publicly traded biotechnology company which was acquired by Catalent, Inc. in 2018. Ms. Merrifield earned a B.A. in Zoology and a Master of Education from The University of Maine, and an M.B.A. from the Amos Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College. Our Board believes that Ms. Merrifield’s commercial expertise specifically in the intra-articular injection field qualifies her to serve on our Board of Directors. CLASSClass II DIRECTORS CONTINUINGIN OFFICE UNTILTHE 2019 ANNUAL MEETINGDirectors Continuing in Office Until the 2022 Annual Meeting
Scott A. Canute has served as one of our directors since 2015. Mr. Canute served as President of Global Manufacturing and Corporate Operations at Genzyme Corporation from 2010 to 2011. Prior to joining Genzyme, Mr. Canute spent 25 years at Eli Lilly and Company and served as President, Global Manufacturing Operations from 2004 to 2007. Mr. Canute currently serves as Executive Director of Immunomedics, Inc. a publicly trade biopharmaceutical company. Previously, Mr. Canute served as a member of the board of directors of ProteonArTara Therapeutics, a biopharmaceutical company focused on renalInc. and vascular disease. Mr. Canute also serves on the board of directors of Oncobiologics,Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., a both publicly traded biopharmaceutical company focused on developing, manufacturing and commercializing biosimilars, and on the board of directors of Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company focused on renal disease.companies. Also, Mr. Canute previously served as a member of the board of directors of AlloCure, Inc., Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Outlook Therapeutics, Inc. (previously Oncobiologics, Inc.), the National Association of Manufacturers and the Indiana Manufacturers Association. Mr. Canute earned a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Michigan and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Our Board believes that Mr. Canute’s manufacturing and operational experience in the biopharmaceutical industry and his experience of serving on the board of directors for several biopharmaceuticals companies qualifies Mr. Canute to serve on our Board of Directors. Samuel D. Colella has served as one of our directors since 2008. Mr. Colella is a Managing Director of Versant Ventures, a healthcare venture capital firm he co-founded in 1999, and has been a general partner of Institutional Venture Partners since 1984. Mr. Colella currently serves as Chairman of the board of directors of Fluidigm Corporation, a publicly traded biotechnology tools company, and is a member of the board of directors of several private companies. Mr. Colella previously served on the board of directors of Genomic Health, Inc., a molecular diagnostics company, from 2001 to 2014, Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, from 2002 to 2012, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from 2003 to 2012 and Veracyte, Inc., a molecular diagnostics company, from 2006 to 2014. Mr. Colella earned a B.S. in business and engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and an M.B.A. from Stanford University. Our Board believes that Mr. Colella’s broad understanding of the life science industry and his extensive experience in working with emerging private and public companies qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors. Mark P. Stejbach joined our board of directors in 2016. Mr. Stejbach currently serves as Senior Commercial Advisor at EIP Pharma, Inc. Previously, Mr. Stejbach served as Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Alkermes plc, a publicly traded global biopharmaceutical company. Mr. Stejbach has over 30 years of experience in the biotech and pharmaceuticals,pharmaceutical industries, including senior roles in a broad range of commercial functions including marketing, sales, economic affairs, managed care and finance. Prior to his current role at Alkermes, Mr. Stejbach served as the Chief Commercial Officer at Tengion, Inc. from 2008 to 2012, and he previously held senior positions at Merck & Co. and Biogen. MarkBiogen Inc. Mr. Stejbach received his M.B.A. from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania and a B.S. in mathematics from Virginia Tech. Our Board believes that Mr. Stejbach’s executive and operational experience in the pharmaceutical industry and commercial expertise qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.
Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
INDEPENDENCEOF THE BOARDOF DIRECTORSIndependence of the Board of Directors
As required under the NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”Nasdaq”) listing standards, a majority of the members of a listed company’s board of directorsour Board must qualify as “independent,” as affirmatively determined by the board of directors.Board. The Board consults with the Company’s legal counsel to ensure that the Board’s independence determinations are consistent with relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent,” including those set forth in the pertinent Nasdaq listing standards, of NASDAQ, as in effect from time to time. Consistent with these considerations, after review of all relevant identified transactions or relationships between each director, or any of his or her family members, and the Company, itsour senior management and itsour independent auditors, the Board has affirmatively determined that, with the exception of Dr. Clayman, all of ourthe directors are independent directors within the meaning of the applicable NASDAQNasdaq listing standards. In making this determination, the Board found that none of these directors or nominees for director had a material or other disqualifying relationship with the Company. BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTUREBoard Leadership Structure – POSITIONOF BOARD CHAIRIS SEPARATEFROMTHE POSITIONOFPosition of Board Chair is Separate From the Position Of CEO
The Board has an independent chair, Mr. Mahaffy, who has authority, among other things, to call and preside over Board meetings, including meetings of the independent directors, to set meeting agendas and to determine materials to be distributed to the Board. Accordingly, the Board Chair has substantial ability to shape the work of the Board. The Company believes that separation of the positions of Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer reinforces the independence of the Board in its oversight of the business and affairs of the Company. In addition, the Company believes that having an independent Board Chair creates an environment that is more conducive to objective evaluation and oversight of management’s performance, increasing management accountability and improving the ability of the Board to monitor whether management’s actions are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. As a result, the Company believes that having an independent Board Chair can enhance the effectiveness of the Board as a whole. ROLEOFTHE BOARDIN RISK OVERSIGHTRole of the Board in Risk Oversight
One of the board’sBoard’s key functions is informed oversight of the Company’s risk management process. The Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through the Board as a whole, as well as through various Board standing committees that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, ourthe Board is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure, including a determination of the nature and level of risk appropriate for the Company. OurThe audit committee has the responsibility to consider and discuss ourthe major financial risk exposures and the steps ourthe Company’s management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. The audit committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. OurThe nominating and corporate governance committee monitors the effectiveness of ourthe Company’s corporate governance practices, including whether they are successful in preventing illegal or improper liability-creating conduct. OurThe Company’s compensation committee assesses and monitors whether any of ourthe compensation policies and programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. Further, the Board is actively monitoring the risks associated with the ongoing public health impact of the novel coronavirus pandemic that causes the COVID-19 disease, particularly as it relates to potential disruptions that could severely impact the Company’s commercialization of ZILRETTA®, on-going and future clinical trials and supply chain. MEETINGSOF THE BOARDOF DIRECTORSMeetings of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors met sevenfive times during the last fiscal year. EachAll Board membermembers, except Scott Canute, attended at least 75% or more of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board, and of the committees on which he or she served, held during the portion of the last fiscal year for which he or she was a director or committee member. Scott Canute was unable to attend two meetings of the Board and two meetings of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee because of a family emergency in each case.
INFORMATION REGARDING COMMITTEESOFTHE BOARDOF DIRECTORSInformation Regarding Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board has three standing committees: anAn Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The following table provides membership and meeting information for fiscal 20162019 for each of the Board committees: | Name | | Audit | | Compensation | | Nominating and
Corporate
Governance | | Audit | | Compensation | | Nominating and Corporate Governance | Scott A. Canute | | | | | | X | | | | | | X | Samuel D. Colella | | | | X | | X* | | | | X | | X* | Heath Lukatch, Ph.D. | | | | X | | | | | | X | | | Patrick J. Mahaffy | | | | X* | | X | | | | X | | X | Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M. | | X* | | | | | | X* | | | | | Ann Merrifield | | X | | | | | | X | | | | | Alan W. Milinazzo | | X | | | | | | | | X* | | | Total meetings in fiscal 2016 | | 5 | | 5 | | 2 | | Mark Stejbach | | | X | | | | | Total meetings in fiscal year 2019 | | | 4 | | 4 | | 4 |
In March 2017, Mr. Milinazzo ceased serving on the Audit Committee and joined the Compensation Committee. Mark Stejbach joined the Board on September 13, 2016 and joined the Audit Committee in March 2017.
Below is a description of each standing committee of the Board. Each of the committees has authority to engage legal counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. The Board has determined that each member of each committee meets the applicable NASDAQNasdaq rules and regulations regarding “independence” and each member is free of any relationship that would impair his or her individual exercise of independent judgment with regard to the Company.
Audit CommitteeCommittee The Audit Committee of the Board (the “Audit(“Audit Committee”) was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), to oversee the Company’s corporate accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of its financial statements. For this purpose, the Audit Committee performs several functions, including, among other things: Evaluating the performance, independence and qualifications of our independent auditors and determining whether to retain our existing independent auditors or engage new independent auditors; Reviewing and approving the engagement of our independent auditors to perform audit services and any permissible non-audit services; Monitoring the rotation of partners of our independent auditors on our engagement team as required by law; Prior to engagement of any independent auditor, and at least annually thereafter, reviewing relationships that may reasonably be thought to bear on their independence, and assessing and otherwise taking the appropriate action to oversee the independence of our independent auditors; Reviewing our annual and quarterly financial statements and reports, including the disclosures contained under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and discussing the statements and reports with our independent auditors and management; Reviewing with our independent auditors and management significant issues that arise regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentation and matters concerning the scope, adequacy and effectiveness of our financial and information technology controls; Reviewing with management and our auditors any earnings announcements and other public announcements regarding material developments; Establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding financial controls, accounting or auditing matters and other matters; Preparing the Audit Committee report that the SEC requires in this proxy statement; Reviewing and providing oversight of any related-person transactions in accordance with our related person transaction policy and reviewing and monitoring compliance with legal and regulatory responsibilities, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; Reviewing our major financial risk exposures, including the guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and risk management is implemented; Reviewing on a periodic basis our investment policy; and Reviewing and assessing its performance on an annuala periodic basis. The Audit Committee is currently composed of three directors: Mr. Mahatme, Ms. Merrifield and Mr. Stejbach. The Audit Committee met fivefour times during the fiscal year 2016.2019. The Board has adopted a written Audit Committee charter that is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at www.flexiontherapeutics.com. The Board reviews the NASDAQNasdaq listing standards definition of independence for Audit Committee members on an annual basis and has determined that all members of theour Audit Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 5605(c)(2)(A)(i) and (ii) of the NASDAQNasdaq listing standards). The Board has also determined that Mr. Mahatme qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in applicable SEC rules. The Board made a qualitative assessment of Mr. Mahatme’s level of knowledge and experience based on a number of factors, including his formal education and experience as a chief financial officer for public reporting companies.
Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of DirectorsCommittee The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the CommissionSEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019 with management of the Company. The Audit Committee has discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301,Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountants’ communications with the audit committeeAudit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the accounting firm’s independence. Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2019. Mr. Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M. Ms. Ann Merrifield Mr. Alan W. Milinazzo(1)Mark Stejbach (1) | Mr. Milinazzo ceased serving on the Audit Committee in March 2017. |
Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation(“Compensation Committee”) is currently composed of four directors: Mr. Colella, Dr. Lukatch, Mr. Mahaffy and Mr. Milinazzo. All members of the Company’s Compensation Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 5605(d)(2) of the NASDAQNasdaq listing standards). The Compensation Committee met fivefour times during fiscal year 2016.2019. The Board has adopted a written Compensation Committee charter that is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at www.flexiontherapeutics.com. The functions of the Compensation Committee include, among other things: Reviewing, modifying and approving (or if it deems appropriate, making recommendations to the full Board regarding) our overall compensation strategy and policies; Reviewing and approving the compensation and other terms of employment of our executive officers; Reviewing and approving performance goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our executive officers and assessing their performance against these goals and objectives; Reviewing and approving (or if it deems it appropriate, making recommendations to the full Board regarding) the equity incentive plans, compensation plans and similar programs advisable for us, as well as modifying, amending or terminating existing plans and programs; Evaluating risks associated with our compensation policies and practices and assessing whether risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us; Reviewing and approving (or if it deems it appropriate, making recommendations to the full Board regarding) the type and amount of compensation to be paid or awarded to our non-employee board members; Establishing policies with respect to votes by our stockholders to approve executive compensation as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and determining our recommendations regarding the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation; Reviewing and assessing the independence of compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisors to the Committee as required by Section 10C of the Exchange Act; Administering our equity incentive plans; Establishing policies with respect to equity compensation arrangements; Reviewing the competitiveness of our executive compensation programs and evaluating the effectiveness of our compensation policy and strategy in achieving expected benefits to us; Reviewing and approving the terms of any employment agreements, severance arrangements, change inof control protections and any other compensatory arrangements for our executive officers; Reviewing the adequacy of its charter on a periodic basis; ReviewingTo the extent applicable, reviewing with management and approving any disclosures under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in our periodic reports or proxy statements filed with the SEC;
PreparingTo the extent applicable, preparing a report regarding any disclosures required under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”; and
Reviewing and assessing its performance on an annuala periodic basis. Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures Typically, theThe Compensation Committee meets quarterlyperiodically throughout the year and with greater frequency if necessary. The Compensation Committeealso meets regularly in executive session. From time to time, various members of management and other employees, as well as outside advisors or consultants may be invited by the Compensation Committee to make presentations, to provide financial or other background information or advice or to otherwise participate in Compensation Committee meetings. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer may not participate in, or be present during, any deliberations or determinations of the Compensation Committee regarding his compensation or his individual performance. The charter of the Compensation
Committee grants the Compensation Committee full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company, as well as authority to obtain, at the expense of the Company, advice and assistance from internal and external legal, accounting or other advisors and consultants and other external resources that the Compensation Committee considers necessary or appropriate in the performance of its duties.
Historically, the Compensation Committee has met at one or more meetings held during the first quarter of the year or during the fourth quarter of the previous year to discuss and, if appropriate, make recommendations to the Board regarding, annual compensation adjustments, annual bonuses, annual equity awards and new performance objectives. For executives other than the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee solicits and considers evaluations and recommendations submitted to it by the Chief Executive Officer. In the case of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the evaluation of his performance is conducted by the Compensation Committee in consultation with external advisors that may be engaged from time to time. For all executives, as part of its deliberations, the Compensation Committee may review and consider, as appropriate, materials such as financial reports and projections, operational data, executive stock ownership information, company stock performance data, analyses of historical executive compensation levels and current Company-wide compensation levels, compensation surveys and recommendations of any compensation consultant, as applicable. Generally, the Compensation Committee has designed the Company’s overall executive compensation program to achieve the following objectives: Attempt to attract and retain talented and experienced executives; Motivate and reward executives whose knowledge, skills and performance are critical to our success; Provide a competitive compensation package that aligns the interests of our executive officers and stockholders by including a significant variable component which is weighted heavily toward performance-based rewards; Ensure fairness among executive officers by recognizing the contributions each executive makes to our success; and Foster a shared commitment among executives by aligning their individual goals with our corporate goals and the creation of stockholder value. The Compensation Committee retained an independent compensation consultant, Radford, an Aon Hewitt company (“Radford”), to assist the Compensation Committee in developing the Company’s overall executive and director compensation programs for 2016 and 2017,2019, including base pay, bonus percentage and equity awards. To assist in determining executive compensation in 2016,2019, Radford and the Compensation Committee reviewed a peer group of publicly traded companies in the life sciences industry at a stage of development, market capitalization and size comparable to ours.the Company. The Compensation Committee believed these companies were generally comparable to ourthe Company and that wethe Company competed with these companies for executive talent. In addition to the publicly available information with respect to peer group companies, Radford gathered competitive market data from the Radford Global TechnologyLife Sciences Survey of public biopharmaceutical companies with less than 100 employees for the Compensation Committee’s analysis of executive compensation. THESPECIFICDETERMINATIONSOFTHE COMPENSATION COMMITTEEWITHRESPECTTOEXECUTIVECOMPENSATIONFORFISCAL 2016AREDESCRIBEDINGREATERDETAILUNDERTHEHEADING “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.The specific determinations of the Compensation Committee with respect to executive compensation for fiscal year 2019 are described in greater detail under the heading “Executive Compensation.”
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKSAND INSIDER PARTICIPATIONCompensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
As noted above, the Company’s Compensation Committee consists of Mr. Colella, Dr. Lukatch, Mr. Mahaffy and Mr. Milinazzo. No member of the Compensation Committee has ever been an executive officer or employee of the Company. None of the Company’s executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last completed year, on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Board or the Compensation Committee. Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board (the “Nominating(“Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”) is currently composed of three directors: Mr. Canute, Mr. Colella and Mr. Mahaffy. All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQNasdaq listing standards). The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met twofour times during fiscal year 2016.2019. The Board has adopted a written Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter that is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at www.flexiontherapeutics.com.
The functions of ourthe Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include, among other things: Identifying, reviewing and evaluating candidates to serve on the Board consistent with criteria approved by the Board;our Board of Directors; Determining the minimum qualifications for service on the Board; Evaluating director performance on the Board and applicable committees of the Board and determining whether continued service on the Board is appropriate; Evaluating, nominating and recommending individuals for membership on the Board; Evaluating nominations by stockholders of candidates for election to the Board; Considering and assessing the independence of members of the Board; Developing a set of corporate governance policies and principles, including a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, periodically reviewing and assessing these policies and principles and their application and recommending to the Board any changes to such policies and principles; Considering questions of possible conflicts of interest of directors as such questions arise; Reviewing the adequacy of its charter on an annual basis; and Reviewing and assessing its performance on an annuala periodic basis. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also intends to consider such factors as possessing relevant expertise upon which to be able to offer advice and guidance to management, having sufficient time to devote to the affairs of the Company, demonstrated excellence in his or her field, having the ability to exercise sound business judgment and having the commitment to rigorously represent the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. However, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee retains the right to modify these qualifications from time to time. Candidates for director nominees are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the Board, the operating requirements of the Company and the long-term interests of stockholders. In conducting this assessment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee typically considers diversity, age, skills and such other factors as it deems appropriate, given the current needs of the Board and the Company, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability. In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews these directors’ overall service to the Company during their terms, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance and any other relationships and transactions that might impair the directors’ independence. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also takes into account the results of the Board’s self-evaluation, conducted periodically on a group and individual basis. In the case of new director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also determines whether the nominee is independent for Nasdaq purposes, which determination is based upon applicable Nasdaq listing standards, applicable SEC rules and regulations and the advice of counsel, if necessary. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets to discuss and consider the candidates’ qualifications and then selects a nominee for recommendation to the Board by majority vote. The Company has adopted a formal policy for receiving and considering director candidates recommended by stockholders. Pursuant to the policy, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will not alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates based on whether or not the candidate was recommended by a stockholder. Stockholders who wish to recommend individuals for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to become nominees for election to the Board may do so by delivering a written recommendation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at the following address: 10 Mall Road, Suite 301, Burlington, MA 01803, Attn: Corporate Secretary, no later than the 90th day and no earlier than the 120th day prior to the one year anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Submissions must include (1) the name and address of the Company stockholder on whose behalf the submission is made; (2) the number of Company shares that are owned beneficially by such stockholder as of the date of the submission; (3) the full name of the proposed candidate; (4) a description of the proposed candidate’s business experience for at least the previous five years; (5) complete biographical information for the proposed candidate; (6) a description of the proposed candidate’s qualifications as a director and (7) any other information required by our Bylaws. Each submission must also be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed candidate to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. The Company may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as the Company may reasonably require to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as an independent director of the Company or that could be material to a reasonable stockholder’s understanding of the independence, or lack thereof, of such proposed nominee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has the authority to engage third-party search firms to identify and provide information on potential candidates. During 2016,
Stockholder Communications with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee engaged Russell Reynolds Associates, an independent executive and director search firm, to assist it in identifying and recruiting suitable director candidates, including Mr. Stejbach, to our Board. Russell Reynolds Associates was paid $100,000 in fees in fiscal year 2016 for their services. STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSBoard of Directors
The Company has adopted a formal process by which stockholders may communicate with the Board or any of ourits directors. Pursuant to this policy, stockholders wishing to communicate with the Board or an individual director may send a written communication to the Board or such director c/o Flexion Therapeutics, Inc., 10 Mall Road, Suite 301, Burlington, MA 01803, Attn: Corporate Secretary. Written communications may be submitted anonymously or confidentially and may, at the discretion of the person submitting the communication, indicate whether the person is a stockholder or other interested party. Alternatively, stockholders may submit communications to the Board as a group through the Investor page of our website at http:https://ir.flexiontherapeutics.com.ir.flexiontherapeutics.com/corporate-governance/contact-the-board. Each communication will be reviewed by the Company’s Corporate Secretary to determine whether it is appropriate for presentation to the Board or the applicable director. Communications determined by the Secretary to be appropriate for presentation to the Board or the applicable director will be submitted to the Board or such director on a periodic basis. Communications determined by the Corporate Secretary to be inappropriate for presentation will still be made available to any non-management director upon the director’s request. CODEOF ETHICSCode of Ethics
The Company has adopted the Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all officers, directors and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Company’s website at www.flexiontherapeutics.com.https://ir.flexiontherapeutics.com. If the Company makes any substantive amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or grants any waiver from a provision of the Code to any executive officer or director, the Company will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on its website.
PROPOSALProposal 2
RATIFICATIONOF SELECTIONOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMRatification Of Selection Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20172020 and has further directed that management submit the selection of its independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the annual meeting. PwC has audited the Company’s financial statements since 2007.2010. Representatives of PwC are expected to be present at the annual meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. Neither the Company’s Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the selection of PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Audit Committee is submitting the selection of PwC to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain PwC. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of different independent auditors at any time during the year if they determineit determines that such a change would be in the best interestsinterest of the Company and its stockholders. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in personat the virtual meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the annual meeting will be required to ratify the selection of PwC. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEESAND SERVICESPrincipal Accountant Fees and Services
The following table represents aggregate fees billed to the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20162019 and December 31, 2015,2018, by PwC, the Company’s principal accountant.accountant: | | | | | | | | Fiscal Year Ended | | | | 2016 | | 2015 | Audit Fees(1) | | $ 548,750 | | $ 435,000 | Audit-related Fees | | — | | — | Tax Fees(2) | | 61,702 | | 85,250 | All Other Fees(3) | | 1,800 | | 1,800 | | | | | | Total Fees | | $ 612,252 | | $ 522,050 |
| | Fiscal Year Ended | | Types of Fees | | 2019 | | | 2018 | | Audit Fees (1) | | $ | 919,550 | | | $ | 783,075 | | Audit-Related Fees | | | — | | | | — | | Tax Fees (2) | | | 30,907 | | | | 2,103 | | All Other Fees (3) | | | 2,756 | | | | 2,756 | | Total Fees | | $ | 953,213 | | | $ | 787,934 | |
(1) | “Audit Fees” consist of fees for the audit of the Company’s financial statements and the review of the interim financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings. |
(2) | “Tax Fees” consist of fees for professional services primarily related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. |
(3) | “All Other Fees” represent fees associated with access to an onlineon-line accounting research database.database and disclosure checklist. |
In connection with the audit of the Company’s 20162019 financial statements, the Company entered into an engagement agreement with PwC that setsset forth the terms by which PwC will performperformed audit services for the Company. PRE-APPROVAL POLICIESAND PROCEDURESPre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee has not adopted a policy and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by ourthe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and consequently all audit and non-audit services are pre-approved by the whole Audit Committee or the Audit Committee Chair. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 2.
The Board of Directors Recommends
a Vote “For” Proposal 2
EXECUTIVE OFFICERSProposal 3
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation We are soliciting a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay vote.” This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the compensation philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. The compensation of the Company’s named executive officers subject to the vote is disclosed in the section titled “Executive Compensation” contained in this proxy statement. As discussed therein, the Company believes that its compensation policies and decisions are designed to align executive compensation with the Company’s business objectives and corporate performance, to be consistent with current market practices, and to enable the Company to attract and retain talented and experienced executives to lead the Company successfully in a competitive environment. Accordingly, our Board of Directors is asking the stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in this proxy statement by casting a non-binding advisory vote “For” the following resolution: “RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.” Because the vote is advisory, it is not binding on our Board of Directors or the Company. Nevertheless, the views expressed by stockholders, whether through this vote or otherwise, are important to management and the Board of Directors and, accordingly, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee intend to consider the results of this vote in making determinations in the future regarding executive compensation arrangements. Approval of this proposal requires the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on this matter at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as “Against” votes. Broker non-votes will have no effect. The Board of Directors Recommends
a Vote “FOR” Proposal 3
Executive Officers The following table sets forth certain information regarding our current executive officers, including their ages as of the Annual Meeting:annual meeting: | | | | | NAMEName
| | AGE | | POSITIONPosition
| | Age | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. | | 65 | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | | | 68 | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.David Arkowitz
| | 70Chief Financial Officer | | Chief Scientific Officer | 58 | | Yamo Deniz,Scott Kelley, M.D.
| | 52 | | Chief Medical Officer | | | 61 | | Melissa Layman | | Chief Commercial Officer | | | 51 | | Mark S. Levine | | General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | | | 47 | | Kerry Wentworth | | Chief Regulatory Officer | | | 47 | | Christina Willwerth | | Chief Strategy Officer | | | 49 | |
The following is a brief biography of each of our executive officers: Michael D. Clayman, M.D. wasis a co-founder of Flexion and has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer and as one of our directors since our inception in 2007. Dr. Clayman also serves as the Chairman of the board of directors of both Anokion SA and Ribometrix Inc., both private biopharmaceutical companies. From 2014 to 2018, Dr. Clayman served on the board of directors of Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. and Anokion SA, each, a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company. Previously, Dr. Clayman had a lengthy career at Eli Lilly and Company, a global pharmaceutical company, where he was most recently Vice President, Lilly Research Laboratories, and General Manager of Chorus, Lilly’s early-phase development accelerator. During his career at Lilly, Dr. Clayman also led its Global Regulatory Affairs division, the Cardiovascular Discovery Research and Clinical Investigation, Research and Development at Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, a medical device subsidiary of Lilly, the Internal Medicine Division, the Lilly Clinic, Lilly’s dedicated Phase 1 unit, and served as Chair of Lilly’s Bioethics Committee. Prior to his tenure at Lilly, Dr. Clayman was an Assistant Professor in the School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, where his research centered on the immunopathogenesis of renal disease. Dr. Clayman is the recipient of the Physician Scientist Award from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Clayman earned a B.A., cum laude, from Yale University and an M.D. from the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine. Following an internship and residency in Internal Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco Moffitt Hospitals, Dr. Clayman completed clinical and research fellowships in Nephrology at the University of Pennsylvania. Neil Bodick,David Arkowitz joined Flexion as Chief Financial Officer (CFO) in 2018. Mr. Arkowitz brings more than 25 years of finance and operations leadership experience in the life sciences and biotechnology industries. Prior to joining Flexion, Mr. Arkowitz served as Chief Operating Officer and CFO at Visterra, Inc., a biotechnology company which was acquired by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., where he led the finance, business development, corporate planning, and other functions. Since 2014, Mr. Arkowitz has also served on the board of directors and as chair of the audit committee of Spring Bank Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a public biopharmaceutical company. In March 2019, Mr. Arkowitz was appointed to the board of directors of Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., a public biopharmaceutical company. Previously Mr. Arkowitz was CFO at Mascoma Corporation, AMAG Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC and held additional leadership positions within each company. Preceding his tenure at Idenix, Mr. Arkowitz spent more than 13 years at Merck & Co., Inc. where he held roles of increasing responsibility, including Vice President and Controller of the U.S. operations, Controller of the global research and development division and CFO of the Canadian subsidiary. He obtained his B.A. in mathematics at Brandeis University and his M.B.A. in finance at Columbia University Business School.
Scott Kelley, M.D.was appointed, and assumed the role of, Chief Medical Officer in December 2017 and January 2018, respectively. Dr. Kelley has over 25 years of clinical, academic and industry medical affairs experience. Most recently, Dr. Kelley served as our Vice President of Medical Affairs. Before joining us in 2016, Dr. Kelley held the position of Vice President, Global Medical Affairs at Sanofi S.A. where he oversaw global data generation, data dissemination and key opinion leader engagement strategy for the biosurgery portfolio including Synvisc®, Ph.D.an injectable product for osteoarthritis of the knee. Prior to Sanofi, Dr. Kelley led medical affairs functions at Covidien Respiratory & Monitoring Solutions Inc. and at Aspect Medical Systems, Inc. Dr. Kelley earned his B.S. and M.S. from Stanford University and his M.D. from University of California, San Francisco. He completed his residency and fellowship in Anesthesiology at UCSF and obtained board certifications in Anesthesiology and Pain Management. Dr. Kelley maintains a clinical practice at Brigham & Women’s Hospital. Melissa Layman was a co-founder and was recently appointed as our Chief ScientificCommercial Officer (CCO) in March 2020. Ms. Layman has more than 25 years of commercial experience within the life science industry. Over the course of her career Ms. Layman has held positions of increasing responsibility across all areas of commercial operations including sales, marketing, market access functions. Most recently, Ms. Layman served as Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing at Lantheus Medical Imaging Inc. where she was a role he transitionedmember of the executive leadership team. During her nearly 10-year tenure, she was responsible for global sales, marketing, communications, health policy, pricing and reimbursement, commercial development and international operations. Prior to after servingLantheus, she served as Executive Marketing Director
at Forest Laboratories LLC (now Allergan PLC), where she led the cardiovascular franchise through the successful launch of its lead product, Bystolic. Previously, Ms. Layman held senior marketing positions at Altus Pharmaceuticals Inc. (now Vertex Inc.) and Sepracor Inc. (now Sunovion Pharmaceuticals), where she launched Xopenex MDI and Lunesta, building and integrating the market access function across the business. She began her career with TAP Pharmaceuticals Inc. (now Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A. Inc.) where her positions ranged from sales representative to National Marketing Director, Gastroenterology and Oncology. Ms. Layman holds a B.A. from Ithaca College and an executive M.B.A. from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. Mark S. Levine joined us as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in June 2017. Mr. Levine has more than 20 years of experience counseling companies on general corporate matters, including: strategic corporate development; complex commercial transactions; mergers, acquisitions and divestitures; licensing agreements and corporate partnerships; financings; securities law; corporate governance; and regulatory compliance. Prior to joining us, Mr. Levine served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and a member of the executive management team of Minerva Neurosciences, Inc., a publicly traded biotechnology company. Mr. Levine has also served in senior legal positions at athenahealth, Inc., a network-based health internet technology company; Clinical Data, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company acquired by Forest Laboratories, Inc. in 2011; Wheelabrator Technologies Inc., a renewable energy company; and Xpedior Incorporated, an internet consulting company. Mr. Levine earned his B.A. in political science from Binghamton University, SUNY, and his J.D. from Washington University School of Law in St. Louis. Kerry Wentworth was appointed as our Chief MedicalRegulatory Officer sincein December 2017 and was previously our inceptionSenior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs & Quality. Ms. Wentworth brings more than 20 years of experience in 2007. Previously, Dr. Bodick was at Eli Lillyboth domestic and Company, where he founded Chorusinternational regulatory affairs that spans early and late development across multiple therapeutic areas. Prior to joining us in 2014, Ms. Wentworth served as Chief Medical OfficerVice President, Clinical, Regulatory and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to that, Dr. BodickQuality at Agenus, Inc., where she was responsible for early-phase clinical investigation at Lilly Research Laboratories. Dr. Bodick also was Assistant Professor in the School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, where his research centered on the development of computer-based systems to support image-intensive diagnosis. Dr. Bodick holds 14 patents in the areas of neuroscienceleading all global regulatory and computer science and is the recipient of the Biomedical Research Service Award and the New Investigator Research Award from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Bodick earned an A.B. from Cornell University, a Ph.D. in neuroscience from Columbia University, an M.D. from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and an M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Yamo Deniz, M.D.was appointed our Chief Medical Officer in April 2017. Dr. Deniz previously served as the Vice President and Head of Global Medical Affairs for Rare Diseases at Sanofi-Genzyme from 2013 until joining us in 2017. Prior to that, Dr. Deniz was employed by GE Healthcare from 2010 to 2013, where Dr. Deniz served in various roles, including serving as the Vice President and Global Head of Development at GE Healthcare Medical Diagnostics as well as the Chief Medical Officer, Global Head of Medical & Pharmacovigilance at GE Healthcare Life Sciences. Prior to his time at GE Healthcare, Dr. Deniz held numerous senior clinical development positionsefforts for nearly 10 years. Previously, Ms. Wentworth led the Regulatory and leadership rolesQuality function for Genelabs Technologies, Inc., where she was responsible for advancing their lead program through Phase 3 development and into the registration phase with FDA and EMA. Ms. Wentworth also held positions of increasing responsibility within Regulatory Affairs at Genzyme Corporation. Ms. Wentworth holds a B.S. in the Respiratory and Inflammation groups at Genentech and Roche Pharmaceuticals,respectively. Dr. Deniz earned an B.A. in chemistry from the College of the Holy Cross and an M.D.pre-veterinary medicine from the University of Massachusetts Medical School. Following an internshipNew Hampshire.
Christina Willwerth was named Flexion’s Chief Strategy Officer in January 2019. Ms. Willwerth has more than 25 years of experience in pharmaceutical development. Ms. Willwerth joined Flexion in June 2009. Ms. Willwerth most recently served as our Senior Vice President of Program Management and residencyStrategy and in Pediatricsher expanded role, she continues to lead the planning and execution of our strategic vision and business priorities and is accountable for our portfolio development efforts and Human Resources activities. Ms. Willwerth joined us from Viacell, Inc. where she was a member of the company’s executive management team and served as Vice President, Product Development, with management responsibility for the company’s interdisciplinary cellular therapy and fertility preservation development programs. She previously served as Senior Director, Product Development at the Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Dr. Deniz completedThe Medicines Company, where she focused on cardiovascular therapy clinical and product development. Prior to that, she held a fellowshipnumber of ascendant clinical operations positions at Astra Pharmaceuticals and Biopure Corporation. Ms. Willwerth holds a B.S. in Pediatric Allergy and Immunology at Duke University Medical Center. Biology, with high distinction, from Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
SECURITY OWNERSHIPOF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERSAND MANAGEMENTSecurity Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the ownership of the Company’s common stock as of March 24, 201731, 2020 by: (i) each director and nominee for director; (ii) each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table; (iii) all current executive officers and directors of the Company as a group; and (iv) all those known by the Company to be beneficial owners of more than five percent of the Company’s common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for the following stockholders is c/o Flexion Therapeutics, Inc., 10 Mall Road, Suite 301, Burlington, MA 01803. | | | | | | | | | | | | Beneficial Ownership(1) | | Beneficial Owner | | Number of Shares | | | Percent of Total | | 5% or greater stockholders | | | | | | | | | Gilder, Gagnon, Howe & Co. LLC(2) | | | 4,379,464 | | | | 13.80% | | Versant Venture Capital III, L.P. and its affiliates(3) | | | 3,921,092 | | | | 12.35% | | Capital World Investors(4) | | | 2,433,000 | | | | 7.66% | | BlackRock, Inc.(5) | | | 2,033,900 | | | | 6.41% | | The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and its affiliates(6) | | | 1,948,329 | | | | 6.14% | | Sofinnova Capital VI FCPR(7) | | | 1,700,291 | | | | 5.36% | | | | | | | | | | | Directors and named executive officers | | | | | | | | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D.(8) | | | 1,133,507 | | | | 3.53% | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.(9) | | | 643,540 | | | | 2.01% | | Frederick W. Driscoll (10) | | | 177,729 | | | | * | | Patrick J. Mahaffy(11) | | | 83,324 | | | | * | | Scott A. Canute(11) | | | 33,458 | | | | * | | Samuel D. Colella(12) | | | 3,950,550 | | | | 12.43% | | Heath Lukatch, Ph.D.(11) | | | 20,458 | | | | * | | Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M.(11) | | | 37,458 | | | | * | | Ann Merrifield(13) | | | 39,958 | | | | * | | Alan W. Milinazzo(11) | | | 47,908 | | | | * | | Mark Stejbach(14) | | | — | | | | * | | All current executive officers and directors as a group (11 persons)(15) | | | 5,216,420 | | | | 15.98% | |
| | Beneficial Ownership(1) | | | Beneficial Owner | | Number of Shares | | | Percent of Total | | | 5% or greater stockholders | | | | | | | | | | Miller Value Partners, LLC (2) | | | 4,932,875 | | | | 12.79 | % | | Versant Venture Capital III, L.P. and its affiliates (3) | | | 3,921,092 | | | | 10.17 | % | | BlackRock, Inc (4) | | | 3,064,652 | | | | 7.95 | % | | Capital World Investors (5) | | | 2,510,700 | | | | 6.51 | % | | Wasatch Advisors, Inc. (6) | | | 2,168,857 | | | | 5.62 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | Directors and named executive officers | | | | | | | | | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. (7) | | | 1,712,690 | | | | 4.34 | % | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D. (8) | | | 760,162 | | | | 1.96 | % | | Scott Kelley, M.D. (9) | | | 92,436 | | | * | | | Patrick J. Mahaffy (10) | | | 137,324 | | | * | | | Scott A. Canute (11) | | | 75,958 | | | * | | | Heath Lukatch, Ph.D. (11) | | | 34,000 | | | * | | | Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M. (11) | | | 75,958 | | | * | | | Alan W. Milinazzo (11) | | | 85,408 | | | * | | | Samuel D. Colella (12) | | | 4,063,887 | | | | 10.52 | % | | Ann Merrifield (13) | | | 85,958 | | | * | | | Mark Stejbach (14) | | | 63,038 | | | * | | | All current executive officers and directors as a group (15 persons) (15) | | | 6,963,934 | | | | 17.03 | % | |
* | Less than one percent.1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. |
(1) | This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors and principal stockholders and Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to community property laws where applicable, the Company believeswe believe that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Applicable percentages are based on 31,743,95838,562,422 shares of the Company’sour common stock outstanding on March 24, 2017.31, 2020. In computing percentage ownership of a person, shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable by such person or RSUs that will vest within 60 days of March 24, 201731, 2020 are deemed outstanding. These shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. |
(2) | This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G/A13G filed on February 14, 20172020 by Gilder, Gagnon, Howe & Co.Miller Value Partners, LLC (“Gilder Gagnon”Miller Value”). Gilder Gagnon reportedMiller Value is an investment advisor and is deemed to have sole voting and sole dispositive power for 104,746 of such shares and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of 4,274,718over all of such shares. The shares reported include 3,589,407 shares held in customer accounts of Gilder Gagnon over which partners and/or employees of Gilder Gagnon have discretionary authority to dispose of or direct the disposition of these shares, 104,746 shares held in the account of the profit sharing plan of Gilder Gagnon and 685,311 shares held in accounts owned by the partners of Gilder Gagnon and their families. The address of Gilder Gagnon’sMiller Value’s principal business office is 475 10th Avenue, New York, NY 10018.One South Street, Suite 2550, Baltimore, MD 21202. |
(3) | Includes (a) 3,511,670 shares held by Versant Venture Capital III, L.P., (b) 20,739 shares held by Versant Side Fund III, L.P. and (c) 388,683 shares held by Versant Development Fund III, LLC (“VDF III”). Brian G. Atwood, Ross A. Jaffe, M.D., Samuel D. Colella, Donald B. Milder, Rebecca B. Robertson, Bradley J. Bolzon, Ph.D., William J. Link, Ph.D., Charles M. Warden, Robin L. Praeger and Barbara N. Lubash, as managing members of Versant Ventures III, LLC, which is the general partner of each of Versant Venture Capital III, L.P., Versant Side Fund III, L.P. and VDF III (collectively, the “Versant Funds”), share voting and investment power over the shares held by the Versant Funds and |
| may be deemed to have indirect beneficial ownership of such shares. The address of the Versant Funds’ principal business office is One Sansome Street, Suite 3630, San Francisco, CA 94104. |
(4) | This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 13, 20174, 2020 by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”). BlackRock, a parent holding company filing on behalf of itself and the other reporting persons named on an exhibit therein, reported that it had sole voting power with respect to 2,941,784 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,064,652 shares. The address of BlackRock’s principal business office is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. |
(5) | This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 14, 2020 by Capital World Investors (“CapitolCapital World”). CapitolCapital World is an investment advisor and is deemed to have sole voting and sole dispositive power over all of such shares. Capital World is a division of Capital Research and Management Company. The address of Capital World’s principal business office is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071. |
(5)(6) | This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G filed on January 30, 2017 by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”). BlackRock, a parent holding company, reported that it had sole voting power with respect to 1,994,740 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all such shares. The address of BlackRock’s principal business office is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. |
(6) | This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G filed on February 3, 201710, 2020 by The Bank of New York Mellon CorporationWasatch Advisors, Inc. (“BNY Mellon”Wasatch”). BNY Mellon, filing on behalf of itselfWasatch is an investment advisor and the other reporting persons named on an exhibit therein, reported that it hadis deemed to have sole voting power with respect to 1,865,827 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect toover and beneficial ownership of all such2,168,857 shares. The address of BNY Mellon’sWasatch’s principal business office is 255 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10286.505 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108. |
(7) | This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 16, 2017 by Sofinnova Capital VI FCPR (“Sofinnova Capital”). Sofinnova Partners SAS (“Sofinnova Partners”), a French corporation and the management company of Sofinnova Capital, may be deemed to have sole or shared voting and dispositive power over these shares and Dennis Lucquin, Antoine Papiernik, Rafaèle Tordjman, M.D., Ph.D. and Monique Saulnier, the managing partners of Sofinnova Partners, may be deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power over all of such shares. The address of Sofinnova Capital’s principal place of business is Immeuble le Centorial, 16-18 rue du Quatre-Septembre, 75002 Paris, France. |
(8) | Includes 15,14650,374 shares held by Dr. Clayman and 410,695912,684 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 24, 2017.31, 2020. Also includes (a) 294,383336,349 shares held by the Michael D. Clayman 2006 Revocable Trust, of which Dr. Clayman and his spouse are co-trustees, (b) 24,600 shares held by the Michael D. Clayman 2006 Irrevocable Trust, of which Dr. Clayman and his spouse are co-trustees and (c) 388,683 shares of common stock held by VDF III, of which Dr. Clayman is a manager and minority member. Dr. Clayman disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares held by VDF III except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in these shares. |
(9)(8) | Dr. Bodick, formerly Chief Scientific Officer of the Company, ceased serving in this position in connection with his retirement effective January 3, 2020 and currently serves as a consultant to the Company. Includes 59,937(a) 68,153 held by Dr. Bodick, (b) 1,000 shares held by Dr. Bodick and 194,920Bodick’s spouse, (c) 302,326 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 24, 2017. Also includes31, 2020 and (d) 388,683 shares of common stock held by VDF III, of which Dr. Bodick is a manager and minority member. Dr. Bodick disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares held by VDF III except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in these shares. |
(10)(9) | Includes 7,09718,199 shares held by Mr. DriscollDr. Kelley and 170,63274,237 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 24, 2017.31, 2020. |
(11)(10) | Includes 30,824 shares held by Mr. Mahaffy and 106,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2020. |
(11) | Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 24, 2017.31, 2020. |
(12) | Includes 25,504 shares held by Mr. Colella and 66,958 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2020. Also includes (a) 5,000 shares held by the Colella Family Exempt Marital Deduction Trust, of which Mr. Colella is a trustee and beneficiary, (b) 45,333 shares held by the Colella Family Trust UTA Dtd. 9/21/92, of which Mr. Colella is a trustee and beneficiary, and (c) the shares held by the Versant Funds referred to in footnote (3) above. Mr. Colella disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares held by the Versant Funds except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Also includes 29,458 |
(13) | Includes 10,000 shares held by Ms. Merrifield and 75,958 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 24, 2017.31, 2020. |
(13)(14) | Includes 2,0001,580 shares held by Ms. Merrifieldthe Mark P. Stejbach Revocable Trust UA 07-08-2016 and 37,95861,458 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 24, 2017.31, 20120. |
(14)(15) | Mr. Stejbach joined the Board on September 13, 2016 and his option grants do not begin vesting until September 13, 2017. |
(15) | Includes 4,320,7834,644,262 shares held by all of our current executive officers and directors as a group and 895,6372,319,672 shares that all of our current executive officers and directors as a group have the right to acquire from us within 60 days of March 24, 201731, 2020 pursuant to the exercise of stock options. The total ownership calculation excludes shares held by Mr. Driscoll, who retired as an executive officeroptions and settlement of the Company effective March 31, 2017, but includes shares held by Yamo Deniz, who joined the Company on April 3, 2017.RSUs. The shares held by Versant Venture Capital III, L.P. and Versant Side Fund III, L.P., which are deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Colella and the shares held by VDF III, which are deemed to be beneficially owned by Drs. Bodick and Clayman and Mr. Colella, are counted only once in this total. |
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEExecutive Compensation
Section 16(a)
The Company is a “smaller reporting company” under Item 10 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and the following compensation disclosure is intended to comply with the requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies. Although the rules allow the Company to provide less detail about its executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee is committed to providing the information necessary to help stockholders understand its executive compensation-related decisions. Accordingly, this section includes supplemental narratives that describe the 2019 executive compensation program for our “named executive officers.” Overview We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of novel, local therapies for the treatment of patients with musculoskeletal conditions, beginning with osteoarthritis, or OA, a type of degenerative arthritis. We have an approved product, ZILRETTA, which we market in the United States. We have two product candidates in our pipeline both focused on the local treatment of musculoskeletal conditions: FX201 and FX301. FX201 is a gene therapy product candidate designed to stimulate the production of an anti-inflammatory protein, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), with the goal of providing at least one year of pain relief from OA of the Exchange Act requiresknee and improving function. FX301 is a locally administered NaV1.7 inhibitor, known as funapide, formulated for extended release in a thermosensitive hydrogel. The initial development of FX301 is intended to support administration as a peripheral nerve block for management of post-operative pain. We aim to further build our pipeline through internal development and the Company’s directorsselective addition of external opportunities. This section discusses our executive compensation decisions for the year ended December 31, 2019 for the individuals who served as our principal executive officer and two other most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2019, referred to as our “named executive officers” for 2019, or NEOs. Our NEOs are the following: Name | Title | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. | President and Chief Executive Officer | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D. | Chief Scientific Officer until January 3, 2020, currently a consultant to the Company | Scott Kelley, M.D. | Chief Medical Officer |
Executive Summary Corporate Performance Highlights In 2019, we executed on our plans to accelerate ZILRETTA sales, advance ZILRETTA’s life cycle management plans, advance our pipeline, and meet our financial objectives. The Compensation Committee considered the achievements described below in determining achievement of our corporate goals. Certain elements of executive compensation are tied to the level of corporate goal achievement as described further below. Highlights of our performance in 2019 include: ZILRETTA sales and related advancement. The full year sales of ZILRETTA totaled $73.0 million in 2019. Throughout 2019, we tracked and reported key metrics which served to provide visibility into our commercial progress since launching ZILRETTA in November 2017. As of December 31, 2019, 3,488 of our 4,972 target accounts (approximately 70%) had purchased ZILRETTA. Further, 2,642 of ordering accounts had placed at least one reorder for additional product. In addition, 794 of our ordering accounts had made ZILRETTA purchases of more than 50 units; 1,028 accounts had purchased 11-50 units; and 1,666 accounts had purchased between 1-10 units. Ordering accounts purchasing more than 50 ZILRETTA units were responsible for 81% of the total ZILRETTA units purchased (142,789 units) since the launch in November 2017 through December 31, 2019. ZILRETTA lifecycle management. On December 26, 2019, we announced that the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”) approved the supplemental New Drug Application (“sNDA”) we submitted in 2018 for repeat administration of ZILRETTA. The revised product label removed language which previously stated that ZILRETTA was “not intended for repeat administration” and replaced it with language stating that “the efficacy and safety of repeat administration of ZILRETTA have not been demonstrated”. The FDA determined that because the data were not from a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, the Phase 3b results were insufficient to warrant full removal of a Limitation of Use statement. The new label includes a study description and safety data from the Phase 3b repeat administration trial and nonclinical toxicology data from previously submitted single and repeat administration studies in non-diseased animals. In addition, the revised label removed a statement that described a single secondary exploratory endpoint in the original Phase 3 pivotal trial comparing ZILRETTA to immediate release triamcinolone acetonide (TA) crystalline suspension. Pipeline advancement. In 2019, we acquired a development-stage Nav1.7 inhibitor known as funapide, which we have formulated with our proprietary thermosensitive hydrogel for control of post-operative pain under our FX301 program. In addition, we made progress with our development of FX201, our gene therapy candidate. In October 2019, the FDA cleared the Investigational New Drug application for FX201. Subsequently, we initiated a Phase 1 first-in-human trial. We have also made advancements in our manufacturing activities for FX201 and FX301. Financial objective. We ended 2019 with $136.7 million in cash, which we attained by achieving $73.0 million in ZILRETTA sales as well as receiving approximately $32.0 million in net proceeds pursuant to the amended credit and security agreement we entered into with Silicon Valley Bank, MidCap Financial Trust and Flexpoint MCLS Holdings, LLC on August 2, 2019 (the “Amended Debt Facility”). The Amended Debt Facility provides for a term loan of $40.0 million and a revolving credit facility of up to $20.0 million, both of which mature on January 1, 2024.
Compensation Highlights Key features of our executive compensation program include the following: | - | We tie pay to performance. We structure a significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation to be variable, at risk and tied directly to our measurable performance. As an executive’s ability to impact operational performance increases, so does the proportion of his or her at-risk compensation. Target long-term incentive compensation grows proportionately as job responsibilities increase, which encourages our officers to focus on the Company’s long-term success and aligns with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The following charts show the portion of the target 2019 total direct compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other NEOs that were “at-risk,” which consists of the target annual performance bonus and target long-term equity awards granted in 2019. |
Name | Target Short Term Incentive | | | Target Long Term Incentive | | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. | $ | 1,024,650 | | | $ | 3,373,956 | | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D. | $ | 620,897 | | | $ | 699,698 | | | Scott Kelley, M.D. | $ | 588,004 | | | $ | 699,698 | | |
86% of our Chief Executive Officer’s total direct target compensation was at risk, with 77% attributable to long-term equity awards and 9% attributable to an annual target bonus award based upon whether we achieved pre-established performance goals. Target short term incentive consists of base salary and target bonus while target long term incentive consists of the grant date fair value of the target equity awards. In 2019, Dr. Clayman’s target equity award included 70,000 performance-vesting stock option awards, which were subject to vesting in the event the Company achieved $75 million in ZILRETTA revenue. Thus, the target long term incentive for Dr. Clayman is based on the grant date fair value of the total target equity award which includes the performance-vesting stock options. | - | Our executive bonuses are dependent on meeting key corporate objectives. Our annual performance-based bonus opportunities for all of our NEOs are dependent upon our achievement of annual corporate objectives established each year. No bonuses are guaranteed. For 2019, the Compensation Committee determined that we met 99.5% of our corporate goals and awarded our NEOs’ bonuses equivalent to 99.5% of each of their target bonuses. |
| - | We emphasize long-term equity incentives. Equity awards are an integral part of our executive compensation program and comprise the primary at-risk portion of our NEO compensation package. We have traditionally granted stock options to our NEOs and in 2018, we introduced restricted stock units (RSUs) into our annual grant program. These awards strongly align our executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders by providing a continuing financial incentive to maximize long-term value for our stockholders and by encouraging our executive officers to remain in our long-term employ. |
| - | We have introduced performance-vesting awards. In 2019, we introduced performance-vesting awards to our Chief Executive Officer as a part of his annual grant. Under the 2019 grant, the performance-vesting portion of his award would only vest if we achieved a stretch ZILRETTA revenue goal and because we did not achieve that goal in full, the performance-vesting portion of the award was forfeited in its entirety. In 2020, we continued to include a performance vesting component in our Chief Executive Officer’s annual equity grant and increased the amount subject to performance vesting to approximately 60% of the total value of his annual grant. |
| - | Change of control payments are limited to double-trigger payments which require termination other than for cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a change of control to trigger payments. |
| - | We do not have contracts that provide our executive officers with any excise tax or other tax gross ups. |
| - | We generally do not provide any special executive fringe benefits or perquisites to our executives, such as car allowances, personal security, or financial planning advice. Our executives are generally eligible to participate in the same benefits as our other employees. |
| - | The Compensation Committee has retained an independent third-party compensation consultant for guidance in making compensation decisions. The compensation consultant advises the Compensation Committee on market practices, including identifying a peer group of companies and their compensation practices, so that the Compensation Committee can regularly assess the Company's individual and total compensation programs against these peer companies, the general marketplace and other industry data points. |
| - | We prohibit any and all hedging and pledging of Company stock. |
Overview of Our Executive Compensation Program The Compensation Committee conducts oversight of our compensation program and policies. Our executive compensation philosophy is based on the following objectives: Aligning executive interests and stockholder interests through long-term incentives linked to Company performance; Attracting, retaining and motivating superior executive talent who exemplify and enhance Company culture; and Providing incentives that reward the achievement of performance goals that directly correlate to the enhancement of stockholder value, as well as to facilitate executive retention.
Our executive compensation program generally consists of the following three principal components: base salary, annual performance-based bonuses and long-term incentive compensation. We also provide our executive officers with severance and change-in-control payments and benefits, as well as other benefits generally available to all our employees, including retirement benefits under the company's 401(k) plan and participation in employee benefit plans. The following table summarizes the three principal components of compensation, their objectives and key features. Element of
Compensation | | Objectives | | Key Features | Base Salary (fixed cash) | | Provides financial stability and security through a fixed amount of cash for performing job responsibilities. | | Reviewed and determined based on a number of factors including individual performance, internal equity, retention, expected cost of living increases and the overall performance of our company, and by reference to market data provided by the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant. | Annual Performance Bonus (at-risk cash) | | Motivates and rewards for attaining rigorous annual corporate performance goals that relate to our key business objectives. | | Target annual performance bonus opportunities, expressed as a percentage of base salary, are reviewed annually and determined based upon positions that have similar impact on the organization and competitive bonus opportunities in our market. Actual bonus payments are based upon specific corporate performance determined by the Compensation Committee, as well as other performance factors that the Compensation Committee deems relevant. | Long-Term Incentive (at-risk equity) | | Motivates and rewards for long-term company performance; aligns executives’ interests with stockholder interests and changes in stockholder value. Attracts highly qualified executives and encourages continued employment over the long-term. | | Annual equity awards are reviewed and determined at the beginning of each year or as appropriate during the year for new hires, promotions or rewards for significant achievement. Individual awards are determined based on a number of factors, including current corporate and individual performance, outstanding equity holdings and their retention value and total ownership, historical value of our stock, internal equity among executives and competitive market data provided by the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant. Equity awards are provided in the form of stock options which vest 25% on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and 1/48 vest monthly thereafter and/or restricted stock units which vest in annual installments rather than monthly over a four-year period subject to continued service with us. Equity awards may also vest based on performance goals including, for our Chief Executive Officer. Stock options and restricted stock units are key aspects of our “pay-for-performance” philosophy, providing a return that increases as the market price of our stock appreciates and, in the case of performance-vesting equity, only if we meet designated performance goals. |
In evaluating our executive compensation program and policies, as well as the short- and long-term value of our executive compensation plans and arrangements, the Compensation Committee focuses on providing a competitive compensation package that provides significant short- and long-term incentives for the achievement of measurable corporate objectives and individual contribution towards our corporate performance. We believe that this approach provides an appropriate blend of short- and long-term incentives to maximize stockholder value. We do not currently have formal policies for allocating compensation among base salary, annual performance bonuses and equity awards, short- and long-term compensation or among cash and non-cash compensation. Instead, the Compensation Committee uses its judgment to establish a target total direct compensation opportunity for each named executive officer that is a mix of current, short- and long-term incentive compensation, and cash and non-cash compensation, that it believes appropriate to achieve the goals of our executive compensation program and our corporate objectives. A significant portion of our NEOs’ target total direct compensation opportunity is comprised of “at-risk” compensation in the form of an annual performance bonus opportunity and equity awards tied to stockholder returns, in order to align the executive officers’ incentives with the interests of our stockholders and our corporate goals.
How We Determine Executive Compensation The Compensation Committee reviews and makes decisions with respect to all compensation paid to our executive officers, including our NEOs. The Chief Executive Officer evaluates and provides to the Compensation Committee performance assessments and compensation recommendations. In making his recommendations, the Chief Executive Officer reviews various third-party compensation surveys and compensation data provided by the independent compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee, as described below. While the Chief Executive Officer discusses his recommendations with the Compensation Committee and the Board, he does not participate in the deliberations concerning, or the determination of, his own compensation. The Compensation Committee or the Board discusses and makes final determinations with respect to executive compensation matters without the Chief Executive Officer present during discussions of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation. From time to time, various other members of management and other employees as well as outside advisors or consultants may be invited by the Compensation Committee or the Board to make presentations, provide financial or other background information or advice or otherwise participate in the Compensation Committee or Board meetings. The Compensation Committee meets periodically throughout the year to manage and evaluate our executive compensation program and determines the principal components of compensation (base salary, performance bonus and equity awards) for our executive officers on an annual basis, typically at the beginning of each fiscal year; however, decisions may occur during the year for new hires, promotions or other special circumstances as the Compensation Committee determines appropriate. Neither the Board nor the Compensation Committee delegates authority to approve executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee does not maintain a formal policy regarding the timing of equity awards to our executive officers; awards are generally approved at a meeting of the Compensation Committee in January of each year. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain compensation consultants to assist in its evaluation of executive compensation, including the authority to approve the consultant’s reasonable fees and other retention terms. In fiscal year 2019, we retained Radford, which is part of the Rewards Solutions practice at Aon plc, to provide executive compensation consulting services to the Compensation Committee and assist it in reviewing our executive compensation programs, making compensation decisions for each of our executive officers and persons who own more than ten percentensuring that our compensation programs remain competitive in attracting and retaining talented executives. The compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee, which maintains the authority to direct its work and engagement. The compensation consultant interacts with management to gain access to company information that is required to perform its services and to understand the culture and policies of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities,our organization. Radford’s engagement with respect to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on2019 executive compensation decisions included conducting a review of the copiesdesign and competitive positioning of such reports furnishedour compensation programs for our Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers and non-employee directors in preparation for making compensation decisions for 2019, reviewing our aggregate long-term incentive practices and updating its prior compensation study regarding equity grant practices. As part of the in-depth review for 2019 compensation, Radford provided the Compensation Committee with the following services, which the Compensation Committee used to make decisions related to compensation for 2019:
reviewed and provided an analysis of the compensation arrangements for all of our NEOs, including the design and structure of our annual cash incentive bonus plan and equity-based incentive compensation program; advised on the design and structure of our cash and equity incentive compensation programs; prepared an analysis of our share usage under our equity incentive plan; updated the Compensation Committee on emerging trends and best practices in the area of executive and Board compensation; provided recommendations and assisted with developing our peer group; provided compensation data for similarly situated executive officers at companies in our peer group; and reviewed and provided recommendations on the compensation program for our non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee considered whether the work of Radford raised any conflict of interest, taking into account the following factors: (i) the amount of fees paid to the compensation consultant, as a percentage of the firm’s total revenue; (ii) the provision of other services to us by the compensation consultant; (iii) the compensation consultant’s policies and procedures that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationship of the individual compensation advisors with any member of the Compensation Committee; (v) any business or personal relationship of the compensation consultant or the individual compensation advisors employed by the firm with any of our executive officers or any members of the Compensation Committee and (vi) any shares of our common stock owned by the compensation consultant or the individual compensation advisors employed by the firm. Based on these factors, the Compensation Committee concluded that the work of Radford and the individual compensation advisors employed by Radford did not create any conflict of interest.
Peer Group and Market Data In addition to Company performance, the Compensation Committee also considers market data from similar companies in our industry. The Compensation Committee engaged Radford to work with the Compensation Committee in order to define a peer group to use to assist in setting NEO compensation for 2019. Radford performed an analysis and compiled a list of 20 peer companies that are comparable to the Company in terms of business activities, revenue and written representationssize. Radford proposed a group of specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies of a similar size (revenue, headcount, and market value) and stage to the Company. The Compensation Committee approved this peer group (listed in the table below) at the end of 2018 and utilized the peer group as a factor in making 2019 compensation decisions for our NEOs. Peer Group Companies 2019 | Aerie Pharmaceuticals | Pacira Pharmaceuticals | Anika Therapeutics | Portola Pharmaceuticals | Array BioPharma | Radius Health | Clovis Oncology | Retrophin | Collegium Pharmaceutical | Sorrento Therapeutics | Corcept Therapeutics | Supernus Pharmaceuticals | Halozyme Therapeutics | Synergy Pharmaceuticals | Heron Therapeutics | Tesaro | Insys Therapeutics | Vanda Pharmaceuticals | Omeros | Vericel |
Radford completed an assessment of executive compensation data based on our 2019 peer group to inform the Compensation Committee’s determinations of executive compensation for 2019. The data used for this assessment was compiled from (i) the 2019 peer group companies’ publicly disclosed information, or public peer data and (ii) data from the Radford Global Life Sciences Survey with respect to the 2019 selected peer group companies listed above, or the peer survey data. The components of the market data were based on the availability of sufficient comparative data for an executive officer’s position. The peer survey data and the public peer data are collectively referred to as market data, and was reviewed by the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Radford, and used as a reference point, in addition to other factors, in setting our named executive officers’ compensation. Radford prepared, and the Compensation Committee reviewed, a range of market data reference points (generally at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the market data) with respect to base salary, performance bonuses, equity compensation (value based on an approximation of grant date fair value), total target cash compensation (including both base salary and the annual target performance bonus) and total direct compensation (total target cash compensation and equity compensation). The Compensation Committee’s general aim is for compensation to remain competitive with the market, falling above or below the median of the market data as appropriate based on corporate and individual executive performance, and other factors deemed to be appropriate by the Compensation Committee. Due to our limited history as a public company and our evolving and growing business, we have not developed a specific market positioning or “benchmark” that no other reportswe consistently aim for in setting compensation levels; instead the Compensation Committee determines each element of compensation, and total target cash and direct compensation, for each named executive officer based on various facts and circumstances appropriate for our company in any given year. Competitive market positioning is only one of several factors, as described below under “Factors Used in Determining Executive Compensation,” that the Compensation Committee considers in making compensation decisions, and therefore individual named executive officer compensation may fall at varying levels as compared to the market data.
In preparation for making 2020 executive compensation decisions, Radford assisted the Compensation Committee in reviewing its peer group and making adjustments. The recommended changes were required, duringmade due to certain companies on the fiscalpeer group list above having experienced material changes in market cap, M&A activity or submitted a bankruptcy filing. Peer Group Companies 2020 | Aerie Pharmaceuticals | Omeros | Akebia Therapeutics | Pacira BioSciences | Anika Therapeutics | Portola Pharmaceuticals | Collegium Pharmaceutical | Radius Health | Corcept Therapeutics | Retrophin | Dermira | Rigel Pharmaceuticals | Eagle Pharmaceuticals | Sorrento Therapeutics | Halozyme Therapeutics | Supernus Pharmaceuticals | Heron Therapeutics | Vanda Pharmaceuticals | Karyopharm Therapeutics | Vericel |
Factors Used in Determining Executive Compensation The Compensation Committee sets the compensation of our executive officers at levels the Committee determines to be competitive and appropriate for each named executive officer, using the Committee’s professional experience and judgment. Compensation decisions are not made by use of a formulaic approach; the Compensation Committee believes that these decisions require consideration of a multitude of relevant factors that may vary from year ended December 31, 2016, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to year. In making executive compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee generally takes into consideration the following factors: our corporate performance and business needs each NEO’s individual performance, experience, job function, change in position or responsibilities, and expected future contributions to our company internal pay equity among our named executive officers and positions the need to attract new talent to our executive team and retain existing talent in a highly competitive industry a range of market data reference points, as described above under “Peer Group and Market Data” the total compensation cost and stockholder dilution from executive compensation actions trends and compensation paid to similarly situated executives within our market its officers, directorscompensation consultant’s recommendations a review of each named executive officer’s total targeted and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were complied with.historical compensation and equity ownership our CEO’s recommendations, based on the CEO’s direct knowledge of the performance of each NEO and the CEO’s review of competitive market data EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLESUMMARY Compensation Table
The following table shows for the fiscal years ended 20162019 and 2015,2018, compensation awarded to, or paid to, or earned by, the Company’s principal executive officer and the two other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2016 (the “NEOs”).NEOs: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name and Principal Position | | Year
| | | Salary
($) | | | Bonus(1)
($) | | | Stock
Awards(2)
($) | | | Option
Awards(2)
($) | | | All Other
Compensation
($) | | | | | | Total ($) | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. | | | 2016 | | | | 500,800 | | | | 330,528 | | | | — | | | | 6,069,000 | | | | 22,297 | | | | (3) | | | | 6,922,625 | | President, Chief Executive | | | 2015 | | | | 480,000 | | | | 216,000 | | | | — | | | | 2,520,100 | | | | 24,239 | | | | (3) | | | | 3,240,339 | | Officer and Co-Founder | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D. | | | 2016 | | | | 400,000 | | | | 176,000 | | | | — | | | | 2,207,400 | | | | 28,406 | | | | (4) | | | | 2,811,806 | | Chief Medical Officer andCo-Founder | | | 2015 | | | | 368,000 | | | | 132,480 | | | | — | | | | 1,030,950 | | | | 27,678 | | | | (4) | | | | 1,559,108 | | Frederick W. Driscoll(5) | | | 2016 | | | | 350,000 | | | | 154,000 | | | | — | | | | 1,656,000 | | | | 22,538 | | | | (6) | | | | 2,182,538 | | Chief Financial Officer | | | 2015 | | | | 324,000 | | | | 107,730 | | | | — | | | | 916,400 | | | | 24,249 | | | | (6) | | | | 1,372,379 | |
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary ($) | | | Bonus(1) ($) | | | Option Awards(2) ($) | | | Stock Awards ($) | | | All Other Compensation ($) | | | Total ($) | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. | | 2019 | | | 621,000 | | | | 401,631 | | | | 2,717,909 | | | | — | | | | 36,820 | | (3) | | 3,777,361 | | President, CEO and Co-Founder | | 2018 | | | 600,000 | | | | 252,000 | | | | 1,687,681 | | | | 650,716 | | | | 31,234 | | | | 3,221,631 | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D. | | 2019 | | | 443,498 | | | | 176,512 | | | | 168,698 | | | | 531,000 | | | | 37,588 | | (4) | | 1,357,295 | | Former Chief Scientific Officer and Co-Founder(6) | | 2018 | | | 428,500 | | | | 137,120 | | | | 578,632 | | | | 223,100 | | | | 36,438 | | | | 1,403,790 | | Scott Kelley, M.D. | | 2019 | | | 420,003 | | | | 167,161 | | | | 168,698 | | | | 531,000 | | | | 39,370 | | (5) | | 1,326,232 | | Chief Medical Officer | | 2018 | | | 400,000 | | | | 128,000 | | | | 482,189 | | | | 185,910 | | | | 12,558 | | | | 1,022,747 | |
(1) | Annual bonuses are granted after the completion of each calendar year at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, taking into account ourthe Company’s performance against corporate goals and, where applicable, each NEO’s performance against his individual goals, as described belowabove under “Annual Performance-Based Bonus Opportunity.” |
(2) | In accordance with SEC rules, this column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards and option awards granted during the respective fiscal year computed in accordance with Financial Accounting StandardsStandard Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 for stock-based compensation transactions, or ASC 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report filed on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 11, 2017.12, 2020. Due solely to the timing of grant dates of awards as determined by the Compensation Committee, the 2018 awards in this column include awards based on performance during fiscal 20152017 that were granted in January 2016 and alsoFebruary 2018. Due to the timing of the grant dates of the awards, the 2019 awards in this column include awards based on performance during fiscal 2016year 2018 that were granted in December 2016. The performance-based restricted stock unitMarch 2019. Also due to the timing of grant dates of awards as determined by the Compensation Committee, awards based on performance during fiscal 2019 were granted in January 2016 vestMarch 2020 and, as a result, are not included. A portion of Dr. Clayman’s stock options granted in 2019 included performance-vesting stock option awards subject to vesting in the event the Company receives approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of a new drug application for Zilrettaachieved $75 million in ZILRETTA revenue (the “Milestone”). The grant date fair value for these awardsof such performance-vesting stock options was determined to be $0 under ASC 718 based upon a determination that as of the grant date, it was not probable that the Milestone would be achieved. The maximum potentialgrant date fair value for the performance-based restrictedof such performance-vesting stock unit awards,options, based on achieving the maximum level of performance under the awards as of the grant date, under ASC 718 would be $1,212,120, $374,010 and $466,830$3,373,956 for each of Dr. Clayman, Dr. Bodick and Mr. Driscoll, respectively. If theClayman. The Milestone iswas not achieved prior to July 1, 2018,in 2019 and all 70,000 of such performance-based stock option awards were cancelled and forfeited. Thus, the awards will not vest, will be forfeited in their entirety and no compensation will be earned related to these awards.grant date fair value of the 290,000 stock options actually granted is $2,717,909. |
(3) | Amounts for 2016 and 20152019 consist of the following, respectively:following: (i) $814 and $2,246$5,925 for life insurance premiums, (ii) $14,928 and $20,880$17,583 for health, dental and dentalvision insurance premiums, (iii) $712 and $1,065 for long-term disability premiums, and (iv) $940 and $47 in tax gross up payments related to long-term disability benefits and (v) $4,903 and $0$12,600 of matching and safe harbor contributions to our 401(k) plan. For more information regarding these benefits, see belowabove under “Perquisites, Health, Welfare and Retirement Benefits.” |
(4) | Amounts for 2016 and 20152019 consist of the following, respectively:following: (i) $542 and $1,497$4,003 for life insurance premiums, (ii) $26,526 and $25,067$24,473 for health, dental and dentalvision insurance premiums, (iii) $712 and $1,065 for long-term disability premiums, and (iv) $626 and $47 in tax gross up payments related to long-term disability benefits. For more information regarding these benefits, see below under “Perquisites, Health, Welfare and Retirement Benefits.” |
(5) | Mr. Driscoll retired as an executive officer$8,400 of the Company effective March 31, 2017. |
(6) | Amounts for 2016 and 2015 consist of the following, respectively: (i) $542 and $561 for life insurance premiums, (ii) $17,110 and $22,575 for health and dental insurance premiums, (iii) $712 and $1,065 for long-term disability premiums, (iv) $626 and $47 in tax gross up payments related to long-term disability benefits and (v) $3,548 and $0 of matchingsafe harbor contributions to our 401(k) plan. For more information regarding these benefits, see belowabove under “Perquisites, Health, Welfare and Retirement Benefits.” |
(5) | Amounts for 2019 consist of the following: (i) $3,363 for life insurance premiums, (ii) $24,473 for health, dental and vision insurance premiums, (iii) $712 for long-term disability premiums, and (iv) $10,823 of matching and safe harbor contributions to our 401(k) plan. For more information regarding these benefits, see above under “Perquisites, Health, Welfare and Retirement Benefits.” |
(6) | Dr. Bodick retired as the Chief Scientific Officer of the Company effective as of January 3, 2020. |
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table Annual Base Salary
The compensationCompensation Committee approved the following 2019 base salaries for each of the NEOs, is generally determined and approved by the Board or the Compensation Committee. The following 2016 base salaries for the NEOswhich were approved and effective as of January 1, 2016:2019. | | | | | Name
| | 2016 Base
Salary
($) | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D.
Name | | 2019 Base Salary ($) | | | % Change from 2018 Base Salary | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. | | | 621,000 | | | 3.5% | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D. | | | 443,498 | | | 3.5% | | Scott Kelley, M.D. | | | 420,003 | | | 5.0% | |
| | | 500,800 | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.
| | | 400,000 | | Frederick W. Driscoll
| | | 350,000 | |
Annual Performance Based Bonus Opportunity
InThe Compensation Committee determined the salary adjustments for Dr. Clayman, Dr. Bodick and Dr. Kelley based on the amount the Compensation Committee determined was appropriate, taking into account the market data in addition to an evaluation of each NEO’s and the Company’s performance. Dr. Bodick’s 2019 salary increase reflects a market average merit increase. Dr. Clayman’s base salaries,salary adjustment was based primarily on market data for peer group CEOs and reflects the NEOs are eligibleCompensation Committee’s determination to receive annual performance-based cash bonuses, which are designed to provide appropriate incentivesbring his base salary closer to the Company’s executivesmedian level. Dr. Kelley’s base salary adjustment was based primarily on market data for peer group chief medical officers and reflects the Compensation Committee’s determination to achieve defined annual corporate goals andbring his base salary closer to reward the executives for individual achievement towards these goals. Themedian level.
Annual Performance-Based Bonus Opportunity - Cash Bonus For 2019, the Compensation Committee applied its annual performance-based bonus that each NEO is eligible to receive isprogram for the NEOs based on the individual’seach NEO’s individual target bonus, as a percentage of base salary, or target bonus percentage, and the extent to which the Company achieves itsachieved key 2019 corporate goalsgoals.
In early 2019, the Compensation Committee reviewed the target bonus percentages for each of our NEOs and the executive achieves his or her personal goals, if any, established for that year. The actual performance-based bonus paid to each executive, if any, is calculated by multiplying the executive’s annual base salary,increased our Chief Executive Officer’s target bonus percentage the percentage attainmentto 65% and determined that each of our other NEO’s target bonus percentages should remain at 40% to promote internal equity and consistency across the executive team. Each NEO’s 2019 target bonus percentage approved by the Compensation Committee is set forth below:
Name | | Target Bonus (% of Base Salary) | | Target Amount | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. | | 65% | | $ | 403,650 | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D. | | 40% | | $ | 177,399 | | Scott Kelley, M.D. | | 40% | | $ | 168,001 | |
The 2019 corporate goals and personal goals, if any, established for such year with respect to the executive and is prorated for the duration of employment for that year. There is no minimum bonus percentage or amount established for the NEOs and, as a result, the bonus amounts vary from year to year based on corporate and individual performance as well as the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of other factors it deems relevant in determining annual bonuses. The corporate and personal goals arewere determined by the Board after recommendation by the Compensation Committee and generally communicated to the NEOs each year, prior to or shortly following the beginning of the year to which they relate or if later, in connection with the commencement of employment of the NEO.early 2019. The Company’s corporate2019 annual goals are comprised of a subset of its most important annualthe Company’s corporate goals and various business accomplishments which vary from timetied to time depending on the Company’s overall strategic objectives. Individual goals are composed of factors that relateAlthough the cash bonus amount paid to each NEO’s ability to guide his or her ownNEOs is based on Company performance, and the performance of his or her direct employee reports towards reaching our corporate goals.
At the end of the year, the Board, or the Compensation Committee reviewsretained the Company’sdiscretion to adjust bonus payouts for individual performance against each corporate goal and each NEO’s personal goals, and approves the extent to which each were achieved. The Board, or the Compensation Committee, may award a bonus in an amount above or below the amount that would otherwise be associated with the degree of goal achievement, based on other factors that the Board, or the Compensation Committee, determines, in its sole discretion arethey determined appropriate and material to the Company’s corporate performance, and provide appropriate incentives to the Company’s executives, for example based onincluding events or circumstances that arise after the original corporate goals were set and/or overall value created for stockholders during the year.
The Board sets the target bonus for eachCompensation Committee did not exercise any discretion in adjusting NEO at the beginning of each year for which the bonus will apply, or if later, in connection with the hiring of a new NEO. Each NEO’s 2016 target bonus percentage is set forth below: | | | | | Name | | Target Bonus
(% of Base Salary)
| | Michael D. Clayman, M.D.
| | | 60% | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.
| | | 40% | | Frederick W. Driscoll
| | | 40% | |
For fiscal 2016, Dr. Clayman’s bonus was entirely dependent uponbonuses from achievement of corporate goals and Dr. Bodick’s and Mr. Driscoll’s bonus were weighted 75% based on achievement of corporate goals and 25% based on Dr. Bodick’s and Mr. Driscoll’s achievement of his respective personal goals.
for 2019.The 2019 corporate goals established by the Board for purposesour NEO performance bonus program, their associated weightings and actual achievement percentages are set forth in the following chart. The Compensation Committee based the percent achievement on a combination of determining bonuses for 2016 included:objective performance and the Compensation Committee’s qualitative assessment of Company performance. | • | | Submit a new drug application (“NDA”) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for ZilrettaTM (also known as FX006), the Company’s investigational, extended-release, intra-articular, analgesic candidate in development for the treatment of osteoarthritis; |
Accomplish 2016 functional objectives to support optimal Zilretta commercialization;2019 Corporate Goal | % Weighting | 2019 Achievement | % Achievement | Meet/exceed ZILRETTA revenue goal of $75M | 60% | In 2019 we achieved ZILRETTA revenue of $73 million, compared to our target of $75 million. The Compensation Committee determined that we achieved 97.5% of our goal. | 58.5% | Execute our life cycle management plan | 10% | The Compensation Committee determined that the life cycle management execution, which included securing approval of the sNDA for ZILRETTA to revise the Limitation of Use statement, or LOU, to an improved position met our objectives and that we achieved 100% of our goal. | 10% | Achieve FX201 milestones (as warranted by tox data) | 10% | The Compensation Committee determined that the advancement of FX201, including the initiation of our first-in-human study, met our objectives and that we achieved 100% of our goal. | 10% | Add at least one new asset to the portfolio | 10% | The Compensation Committee determined that the acquisition of the Nav1.7 inhibitor, funapide, and development of a novel thermosensitive polymeric hydrogel formulation for local delivery of funapide met our objectives and that we achieved 100% of our goal. | 10% | End 2019 with at least $90M cash balance | 10% | The Compensation Committee determined that we exceeded this goal because our cash as of December 31, 2019 was $137 million, which includes the $32 million received in net proceeds from the Amended Debt Facility secured in 2019. | 11% | Total 2019 Achievement | 100% | | 99.5% |
Raise funds as necessary to support operations; and
OptimizeThe following table shows each NEO’s actual 2019 bonus amount, which was paid in 2020, the Company’s product portfolio.On December 20, 2016,percentage of such bonus that the Compensation Committee determined was achieved and the actual amount of 2019 bonuses that were paid to the Company had achieved 110%NEOs:
Name | | Actual Bonus Awarded ($) | | | Actual Bonus Awarded (% of Target Bonus) | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. | | $ | 401,631 | | | 99.5% | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D. | | $ | 176,512 | | | 99.5% | | Scott Kelley, M.D. | | $ | 167,161 | | | 99.5% | |
Equity-Based Incentive Awards We have historically granted equity awards to our NEOs in the form of stock options. In connection with its 2016 corporate goals2019 compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with Radford, evaluated the appropriate form of equity compensation and determined that our long-term incentive compensation program for purposesour NEOs should be adjusted to incorporate RSUs as well as stock options. The Compensation Committee believes that stock options are inherently performance-based, and automatically link executive pay to stockholder return, as the value realized, if any, from an award of 2016 annual performance-based bonuses. stock options is dependent upon, and directly proportionate to, appreciation in stock price. Regardless of the reported value in the Summary Compensation Table, our NEOs will only receive value from their stock option awards if the price of our common stock increases above the price of our common stock at the time of the stock option grant and remains above such price as the stock options continue to vest. The Compensation Committee also believes adding RSUs is appropriate because these awards cover fewer shares than stock options, minimize dilution to our stockholders, provide a return based directly on the market price of our shares, provide retention value and are used by more than half of our peer group. The 2019 equity awards granted to our NEOs are reflected in the table below. The Compensation Committee approved the grant of these awards in March 2019 to the NEOs. Name | | Stock Options | | Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) | | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. | | | 360,000 | | - | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D. | | | 18,000 | | | 36,000 | | Scott Kelley, M.D. | | | 18,000 | | | 36,000 | |
In determining that the Company had achieved 110%size of its 2016 corporate goals,the 2019 equity-based award grants for the NEOs, the Compensation Committee considered among other factors,market data, burn-rate of stock grants issued versus shares outstanding, and the substantial progress in advancing developmentincentive and potential regulatory approval and commercializationretentive qualities of Zilretta, as well as the Company’s financing activities during 2016. Based on the determinationvarious types of 110% corporate goal achievement, Dr. Clayman was awarded a 2016 annual performance-based cash bonus in the amount of $330,528. Additionally, based on the Compensation Committee’s and Dr. Clayman’s assessment, Dr. Bodick and Mr. Driscoll were awarded 2016 annual performance-based cash bonuses in the amounts of $176,000 and $154,000, respectively.
Also, on December 20, 2016, theequity-based awards. For all NEOs except our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee approved target bonus percentages,believed the mix of one-third (1/3) stock options and two-thirds (2/3) RSUs provided the relative weighting of corporate and individual goals, for our executive officers that will be effective for consideration of annual cash bonuses for 2017, in the same percentages and relative weighting of corporate and individual goals as in effect for fiscal 2016.
Equity-Based Incentive Awards
The Company’s equity-based incentive awards are designedappropriate balance to align the Company’sNEOs’ interests with those of its employees and consultants, including the NEOs. The Board orour stockholders. With respect to our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee is responsible for approving equity grants. Until recently, the Company generally granted stockdetermined it was appropriate that he receive his annual grant in options, to its executive officers and employees as incentive compensation, however the Company entered into restricted stock purchase agreements with eachnoting he had received RSUs in 2018, but structured his option grant so that a portion of Dr. Clayman and Dr. Bodick in connection with their commencement of services to the Company in 2007. In January 2016, the Company granted performance-based restricted stock unit awards to certain employees, including our executive officers, the amount and vesting of which isit would only vest based upon when and if we receive approval from the FDAon achievement of a NDA for Zilretta.
Vesting of equity awards is generally tied to continuous service with the Company and serves as an additional retention measure. The Company may also grant equity awards to its employees and consultants from time to time and may make annual equity grants to its executives at the discretion of the Board or the Compensation Committee. In addition, the Company’s executives generally are awarded an initial equity award upon commencement of employment. Additional grants may occur periodicallystretch ZILRETTA revenue performance goal, in order to specifically incentivize executivesfurther align our Chief Executive Officer’s interests with respect to achieving certain corporate goals or to reward executives for exceptional performance or for promotions.stockholder value.
Prior toAll of the Company’s initial public offering in 2014, we granted all stock options pursuant to the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”), the terms of which are described below under “Equity Benefit Plans.” Following our initial public offering, all2019 stock options and otherRSU awards have beenwere granted pursuant to the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”), the terms of which are also described below under “Equity Benefit Plans.”. All options were granted with a per share exercise price equal to no less than the fair market value of a share of ourthe Company’s common stock on the date of grant of each award. Generally ourThe stock option awards (other than a portion of our Chief Executive Officer’s stock option award, as described below) and RSU awards each vest over a four-year period, with RSUs vesting 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the vesting commencement date and stock options vesting 25% on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and 1/48th vesting monthly thereafter until fully vested, and accelerate vesting and exercisability upon the occurrence of a change inof control and the optionholder’soption holder’s termination of service under certain circumstances, as further described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”circumstances.
On January 4, 2016,As previously noted, in 2019 the Compensation Committee granted an optionincluded performance-vesting stock options in our Chief Executive Officer’s annual equity award. 70,000 of our Chief Executive Officer’s 360,000 total stock options award were contingent upon the Company achieving $75 million in ZILRETTA revenue in 2019. Although the Company achieved ZILRETTA revenues representing over 97% of this target, because the target was not fully met, the 70,000 performance-vesting stock options were forfeited and cancelled in their entirety, leaving only the remaining 290,000 stock options subject to purchase 155,000, 55,000time-based vesting, which maintained our Chief Executive Officer’s equity compensation at the 50th market percentile. In 2020, we continued to include a performance-vesting component in our Chief Executive Officer’s annual equity grant and 40,000 shares of common stockincreased the amount subject to Drs. Clayman and Bodick and Mr. Driscoll, respectively, in connection with each officer’s annual performance review for performance during fiscal 2015. On December 20, 2016, the Compensation Committee granted an optionperformance-vesting to purchase 175,000, 65,000 and 50,000 of common stock to Drs. Clayman and Bodick and Mr. Driscoll, respectively, in connection with each officer’s annual performance review for performance during fiscal 2016. All of the options vest over a four-year period where 1/4thapproximately 60% of the total numbervalue of shareshis annual grant which was in the form of RSUs.
Other Features of Our Compensation Program Executive Employment Agreements We maintain offer letters or employment agreements with each of our NEOs (with respect to Dr. Bodick, prior to his retirement in January 2020). Each offer letter or employment agreement provides for “at-will” employment and describes such NEO’s base salary, discretionary cash bonus target, and any equity-based or cash-based grant, including inducement grants. This compensation and any performance-based and annual changes to this compensation are subject to review by the option vest one year afterCompensation Committee. Each NEO’s offer letter or employment agreement also describes the applicable grant datebenefits available, conditions of employment, severance eligibility and thereafter 1/48th of the shares vest monthly over the next three years. In the event such NEO’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by such NEO for good reason, the option shall accelerate and vest to the extent it would have vested in the 12-month period following the date of termination and, if such termination occurs within 12 months following a change of control transaction,severance benefits. In January 2020, we entered into a separation agreement with Dr. Bodick that superseded the option shall accelerateterms of his employment letter agreement. The terms of these letters and vest in full.
On December 17, 2015, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of performance-based restricted stock units under our 2013 Plan to Drs. Clayman and Bodick and Mr. Driscoll, respectively, in connection with each NEO’s annual performance review for performance during fiscal 2015. The performance-based restricted stock unit awards were granted in January 2016. The amount and vesting of the performance-based restricted stock units is based upon when and if we receive approval from the FDA of a NDA for Zilretta. One-third of the shares under the restricted stock unit award will vest on each of the following: the date the Board or Compensation Committee certifies the achievement of the performance conditions and the first and second anniversaries of such date. The target level of achievement under the performance-based restricted stock unit awards for each of Drs. Clayman and Bodick and Mr. Driscollagreements are 44,400, 13,700 and 17,100 shares, respectively. The maximum number of shares deliverable under the performance-based restricted stock unit awards are 66,600, 20,550 and 25,650 shares to each of Drs. Clayman and Bodick and Mr. Driscoll, respectively.described below:
Agreements with our Named Executive Officers
Below are written descriptions of the Company’s employment or offer letters with the NEOs.
Employment Agreement with Dr. Clayman. We entered into a letter agreement with Dr. Clayman in November 2007 setting forth the terms of his employment, subsequently amended and restated the agreement in September 2013 and further amended the agreement in March 2014. Pursuant to his agreement, Dr. Clayman’s 2013 annual base salary was $437,091, subject to increase by ourthe Board, and he is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus based on a percentage of his base salary as described above under “Annual Performance-Based Bonus Opportunity.Opportunity – Cash Bonus.” Dr. Clayman is additionally entitled to certain severance and change of control benefits, the terms of which are described belowabove under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or“Severance and Change of Control.Control Benefits.” Employment Agreement with Dr. Bodick.Bodick. We entered into a letter agreement with Dr. Bodick in November 2007 setting forth the terms of his employment, subsequently amended and restated the agreement in September 2013 and further amended the agreement in March 2014. Pursuant to his agreement, Dr. Bodick’s 2013 annual base salary was $327,818, subject to increase by ourthe Board, and he is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus based on a percentage of his base salary as described above under “Annual Performance-Based Bonus Opportunity.Opportunity – Cash Bonus.” Dr. Bodick is additionally entitled to certain severance and change of control benefits, the terms of which are described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.” Employment Agreement with Mr. Driscoll. Mr. DriscollDr. Kelley. Dr. Kelley was appointed the Company’s Chief Medical Officer in December 2017 and commenced employment as our Chief Financial Officer in May 2013 and his letter agreement was amended and restated in September 2013 and further amended in March 2014.under this position on January 1, 2018. Pursuant to his agreement, Mr. Driscoll’s 2013Dr. Kelley’s annual base salary for 2018 was $300,000$400,000 and he is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus based on a percentage of his base salary as described above under “Annual Performance-Based Bonus Opportunity.Opportunity – Cash Bonus.” Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Driscoll was granted an option to purchase 135,300 shares of our common stock on May 20, 2013, which vests over a four year period. In connection with Mr. Driscoll’s retirement as an executive officer of the Company effective March 31, 2017, his letter agreement was amended to provide that he will continue to provide services as a non-executive employee until we hire a new full-time Chief Financial Officer, at which point, following a transition period, Mr. Driscoll’s employment will automatically terminate. During the period of non-executive employment, Mr. Driscoll’s annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the amendment will be pro-rated according to the level of services that he provides us each week. Mr. DriscollDr. Kelley is additionally entitled to certain severance and change of control benefits, the terms of which are described belowabove under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or“Severance and Change of Control.Control Benefits.” Potential Payments Upon Termination orSeverance and Change of Control Benefits
RegardlessUnder the terms of the manner in which a NEO’s service terminates, the NEO is entitled to receive amounts earned during his termtheir offer letters, employment agreements and our Change of service, including salary and unused vacation pay.
Pursuant to their amended and restated letter agreements entered into in September 2013, as amended in March 2014,Control Severance Benefit Plan, each of the NEOs is entitled to certain severance and change of control payments and benefits. In the event that the executive is terminated without cause or upon the executive’s resignation for good reason, upon his execution of a release and waiver in
favor of the Company, each executive is entitled to receive (1) payments at the rate of his then current salary for 18 months (with respect to Dr. Clayman), 15 months (with respect to Dr. Bodick) or 12 months (with respect to Mr. Driscoll); (2) reimbursement of COBRA health and dental premiums for up to 18 months (with respect to Dr. Clayman), 15 months (with respect to Dr. Bodick) and 12 months (with respect to Mr. Driscoll); (3) with respect to Dr. Clayman and(other than Dr. Bodick, accelerated vesting of their outstandingwho retired effective January 3, 2020) is eligible for severance benefits (cash payments, payments for COBRA premiums and equity awards granted prior to February 25, 2014, to the extent they would have vested during the following 12 months or, if Dr. Clayman’s or Dr. Bodick’s termination without cause or resignation for good reason occurs within 12 months following a change of control, accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards in full and (4) with respect to Mr. Driscoll, accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards in full in the event of a termination without cause or resignation for good reason within 12 months following a change of control. Each of our NEOs is also entitled to his target annual bonusacceleration) upon a termination without cause or a resignation for good reason, either alone or within one month prior to or 12 months following a change of control transaction. We do not maintain any agreements with NEOs providing for tax gross ups in control (as defined under our 2013 Plan) under our Change in Control Bonus Plan.
In addition, each of the NEOs holds stock options under the 2009 Plan and 2013 Plan that provide that the options will vest in full upon the executive’s termination without causeconnection with severance or resignation for good reason within 12 months following a change of control as defined undertransaction. The Compensation Committee reviewed, and our Board approved, these severance benefits, after a review of market data provided by Radford, to ensure that the applicable plan (and, under the 2013 Plan, within one month prior to abenefits remain appropriately structured and at reasonable levels. All change of control).control payments are structured to be on a “double-trigger” basis, requiring an involuntary termination in connection with the change of control transaction. The Board and Compensation Committee believes that these severance protection benefits are necessary to provide stability among our executive officers, serve to focus our executive officers on our business operations, and avoid distractions in connection with a potential change of control transaction or period of uncertainty.
Our NEOs each hold stock options and RSUs under our equity incentive plans that were granted subject to our form of stock option agreements. A description of the termination and change of control provisions in such equity incentive plans and forms of stock option agreements isare provided below under “Equity"Equity Compensation Arrangements.” Regardless of the manner in which an NEO’s service terminates, the NEO is entitled to receive amounts earned during his or her term of service, including salary and unused vacation pay. Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements and the Company’s Change of Control Severance Benefit Plans.Plan, each of the NEOs (other than Dr. Bodick, who retired effective January 3, 2020) is entitled to certain severance and change of control payments and benefits. In order to receive any severance benefits, our NEOs must execute a release and waiver of claims within a set deadline as specified in their respective employment agreement, and they must also fully comply with the obligations under their respective proprietary information, inventions, non-solicitation, and non-competition agreements. The Company grants the severance benefits described below in order to attract and retain top executive talent. Enhanced severance benefits are provided for a qualifying termination that occurs in connection with a change of control because the severance benefits are also intended to mitigate any reluctance of our executive officers to diligently consider and pursue potential change of control transactions that may be in the best interests of our stockholders.
The following table summarizes the severance benefits available to our NEOs. With respect to Dr. Bodick, the following severance benefits were available prior to his retirement in January 2020. For a description of the benefits available to Dr. Bodick in connection with his retirement, please see below under “Separation Agreement with Dr. Bodick.” Termination | Type of
Severance | Dr. Clayman | Dr. Bodick | Dr. Kelley | Termination without cause or resignation for good reason | Cash | Base salary for 18 months | Base salary for 15 months | Base salary for 15 months | Benefits | COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 18 months as eligible | COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 15 months as eligible | COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 15 months as eligible | Termination without cause or resignation for good reason one month prior to or 12 months following a Change of Control | Cash and/or equity | • Base salary for 24 months • Annual target cash bonus for the year in which the termination occurs • All unvested stock awards vest | • Base salary for 18 months • Annual target cash bonus for the year in which the termination occurs • All unvested stock awards vest | • Base salary for 18 months • Annual target cash bonus for the year in which the termination occurs • All unvested stock awards vest | Benefits | COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 24 months as eligible | COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 18 months as eligible | COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 18 months as eligible |
For purposes of the letter agreements:Company’s Change in Control Severance Benefit Plan, which governs the benefits provided in the event of a termination without cause or a resignation for good reason in connection with a change of control: “cause” generally means the executive’s termination by us due to any of the following events: (i) commission of any felony or any crime involving fraud; (ii) attempted commission of, or participation in, a fraud or act of dishonesty against the Company; (iii) intentional, material violation of any contract or agreement between the employee and the Company or of any statutory duty owed to the Company; (iv) repeated and willful failure to satisfactorily perform his or her job duties after written notice and an opportunity to cure; or (v) engaging or participating in any activity which is directly competitive with or injurious to the Company or which violates any material provisions of his or her proprietary information and inventions agreement with the Company. “change of control” generally means (i) any person or entity becomes the owner of more than 50% of the Company’s combined voting power; (ii) a consummated merger, consolidation or similar transaction to which the Company is a party and the Company’s stockholders do not own more than 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity or its parent company; (iii) a consummated sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s consolidated assets; or (iv) the Company’s stockholders or the Board approves a plan of complete dissolution or liquidation or such dissolution or liquidation otherwise occurs. “good reason” generally means a resignation within 90 days after the occurrence of any of the following events, provided the executive first gives written notice to the Company and an opportunity to cure for 30 days after such notice: (i) a material reduction of the employee’s annual base salary; provided, however, that Good Reason shall not be deemed to have occurred in the event of a reduction in employee’s annual base salary is pursuant to a salary reduction program affecting substantially all of the employees of the Company at employee’s level and that does not adversely affect the employee to a greater extent than other similarly situated employees; (ii) a material reduction in the employee’s duties, authority or responsibilities; (iii) a relocation of the employee’s principal place of employment that increases the one-way commute by more than 50 miles; or (iv) a material breach by the Company of any material agreement between the employee and the Company.
For purposes of the employment agreements, which govern the benefits provided in the event of a termination without cause or resignation for good reason not in connection with a change of control: “cause” “cause” for purposes of Dr. Clayman’s and Dr. Bodick’s letteremployment agreements generally means the executive’s termination by the Companyus due to his (i) repeated and willful failure to satisfactorily perform his duties after written notice and an opportunity to cure; (ii) misconduct or dishonesty that materially injures the Company’sour business, business reputation or business relationships; (iii) conviction of, or pleading guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony; (iv) any act of fraud against the Company; (v) personal dishonesty taken in connection with his responsibilities that is intended to result in substantial personal enrichment; (vi) repeated refusal or failure to follow lawful directions of the Board, which remain uncured after written notice; or (vii) engagement or participation in any activity directly competitive with or injurious to the Company or, which violates any material provisions of his proprietary information and inventions agreement with the Company or permitted activities described in his letteremployment agreement after written notice. Dr. Bodick and the Company entered into a Separation Agreement, which became effective in January 2020 pursuant to which Dr. Bodick will no longer be eligible for these severance benefits. “cause”“cause” for purposes of Mr. Driscoll’s letterDr. Kelley’s employment agreement generally means his termination by the Company due to his (i) commission of a felony or crime involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude; (ii) attempted commission of, or participation in, a fraud or act of dishonesty against the Company; (iii) intentional, material violation of any contract or agreement with usthe Company or of any statutory duty owed to the Company; (iv) unauthorized use or disclosure of the Company’s confidential information or trade secrets; (v) gross misconduct; or (vi) failure or refusal to perform the material duties and responsibilities of his position.
“change“change of control” for purposes of each of the NEO’s letter agreementsemployment agreement generally means (i) any person or entity becomes the owner of more than 50% of the Company’s combined voting power; (ii) a consummated merger, consolidation or similar transaction to which the Company is a party and the Company’s stockholders do not own more than 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity or its parent company; (iii) a consummated sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s consolidated assets; or (iv) with respect to Mr. Driscoll,Dr. Kelley, the Company’s stockholders or the Board approves a plan of complete dissolution or liquidation or such dissolution or liquidation otherwise occurs.
“good“good reason” for purposes of each NEO’s letteremployment agreement generally means the executive’s resignation within 90 days after the occurrence of any of the following events, provided the executive first gives written notice to the Company and an opportunity to cure for 30 days after such notice: (i) a material reduction of his annual base salary; (ii) a material reduction in his duties, authority or responsibilities; (ii)(iii) a material reduction in his annual base salary; (iii)(iv) a relocation of his principal place of employment that increases his one-way commute by more than 50 miles; or (iv) with respect to Dr. Clayman and Dr. Bodick,(v) a material breach of his employment letter agreement.Employment Agreement.
Mr. Driscoll retiredSeparation Agreement with Dr. Bodick
In December 2019, we announced Dr. Bodick’s retirement from his role as an executive officerChief Scientific Officer of the Company, which became effective March 31, 2017, butas of January 3, 2020 (the “Separation Date”). In January 2020, we entered into a separation agreement with Dr. Bodick (the “Separation Agreement”). Pursuant to his Separation Agreement, Dr. Bodick is continuingeligible to provide servicesreceive separation pay equal to 15 months of his base salary in effect as an employee until we hireof the Separation Date, up to 15 months of COBRA premium payments and his annual cash performance bonus for 2019. Further, pursuant to his Separation Agreement, Dr. Bodick will be retained as a new full-time Chief Financial Officer, at which point, following an additional transitionconsultant to the Company for a period Mr. Driscoll’s employmentof up to 12 months from the Separation Date. As a consultant, Dr. Bodick will automatically terminate, with such termination not constitutingreceive a termination without cause or resignationfixed consulting fee of $10,000 per month and will continue to vest in his outstanding stock options and RSU awards. The term of all outstanding stock options is modified to be the earlier of (a) the 10-year anniversary of the grant date and (b) three months after the end of the consulting period. The Separation Agreement provides for good reason. OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDSAT FISCALYEAREND
The following table shows for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, certain information regardingpotential vesting acceleration of outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end for the NEOs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Option Awards(1) | | Stock Awards | | Name | | Grant Date | | Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable | | | Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable | | | | | Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#) | | | Option
Exercise
Price(2)
($) | | | Option
Expiration
Date | | Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#) | | | Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($) | | | Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#) | | | Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(3)
($) | | Dr. Clayman | | 09/24/2009 | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | 0.16 | | | 09/23/2019 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 08/29/2012 | | | 136,530 | | | | — | | | (4) | | | — | | | | 2.52 | | | 08/28/2022 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 03/03/2014 | | | 137,500 | | | | 62,500 | | | (5) | | | 62,500 | | | | 17.61 | | | 03/02/2024 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 01/21/2015 | | | 52,708 | | | | 57,292 | | | (7) | | | 27,292 | | | | 22.91 | | | 01/20/2025 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 01/04/2016 | | | — | | | | 155,000 | | | (8) | | | 155,000 | | | | 18.20 | | | 01/03/2026 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12/20/2016 | | | — | | | | 175,000 | | | (9) | | | 175,000 | | | | 18.56 | | | 12/19/2026 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 01/04/2016 | | | — | | | | — | | | (10) | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 66,600 | | | | 1,266,732 | | Dr. Bodick | | 09/24/2009 | | | 37,702 | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | 0.16 | | | 09/23/2019 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 08/29/2012 | | | 58,302 | | | | — | | | (4) | | | — | | | | 2.52 | | | 08/28/2022 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 03/03/2014 | | | 55,000 | | | | 25,000 | | | (5) | | | 25,000 | | | | 17.61 | | | 03/02/2024 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 01/21/2015 | | | 21,562 | | | | 23,438 | | | (7) | | | 23,438 | | | | 22.91 | | | 01/20/2025 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 01/04/2016 | | | — | | | | 55,000 | | | (8) | | | 55,000 | | | | 18.20 | | | 01/03/2026 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12/20/2016 | | | — | | | | 65,000 | | | (9) | | | 65,000 | | | | 18.56 | | | 12/19/2026 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 01/04/2016 | | | — | | | | — | | | (10) | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,550 | | | | 390,861 | | Mr. Driscoll | | 05/20/2013 | | | 121,206 | | | | 14,094 | | | (6) | | | 14,094 | | | | 7.89 | | | 05/19/2023 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 03/03/2014 | | | 27,500 | | | | 12,500 | | | (5) | | | 12,500 | | | | 17.61 | | | 03/02/2024 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 01/21/2015 | | | 19,166 | | | | 20,834 | | | (7) | | | 20,834 | | | | 22.91 | | | 01/20/2025 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 01/04/2016 | | | — | | | | 40,000 | | | (8) | | | 40,000 | | | | 18.20 | | | 01/03/2026 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12/20/2016 | | | — | | | | 50,000 | | | (9) | | | 50,000 | | | | 18.56 | | | 12/19/2026 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 01/04/2016 | | | — | | | | — | | | (10) | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 25,650 | | | | 487,863 | |
(1) | All of the option awards listed in the table above were granted under the 2009 Plan and 2013 Plan, the terms of which are described below under “Equity Benefit Plans.” Except as otherwise indicated, each option award becomes exercisable as it becomes vested and all vesting is subject to the executive’s continuous service with the Company through the vesting dates. |
(2) | All of the option awards listed in the table above were granted with a per share exercise price equal to the fair market value of one share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. For awards granted prior to the Company’s initial public offering, the fair market value was determined in good faith by the Board with the assistance of a third party valuation expert. For awards granted after the Company’s initial public offering, the fair market value was determined based on the prevailing market prices of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. |
(3) | The value of the performance-based restricted stock units shown in the table was calculated using the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2016 ($19.02). |
(4) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after August 29, 2012, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years. In the event such NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by such NEO for good reason, the option shall accelerate and vest to the extent it would have vested in the 12-month period following the date of termination and, if such termination occurs within 12 months following a change of control transaction, the option shall accelerate and vest in full. |
(5) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after March 3, 2014, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years. In the event such NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by such NEO for good reason and if such termination occurs within 12 months following a change of control transaction, the option shall accelerate and vest in full. |
(6) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after May 20, 2013, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years, subject to acceleration in the event Mr. Driscoll’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by Mr. Driscoll for good reason, in each case within 12 months following a change of control transaction. The option was originally granted with an exercise price of $6.59 per share and was subsequently amended to increase the exercise price to $7.89 per share. |
(7) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after January 21, 2015, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years. In the event such NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by such NEO for good reason and if such termination occurs within 12 months following a change of control transaction, the option shall accelerate and vest in full. |
(8) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after January 4, 2016, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years. In the event such NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by such NEO for good reason and if such termination occurs within 12 months following a change of control transaction, the option shall accelerate and vest in full. |
(9) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after December 20, 2016, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years. In the event such NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by such NEO for good reason and if such termination occurs within 12 months following a change of control transaction, the option shall accelerate and vest in full. |
(10) | The performance restricted stock units vest in the event the Milestone is achieved. Amounts in the table reflect the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock deliverable under the restricted stock unit award based upon maximum performance. If the Milestone is not achieved prior to July 1, 2018, the awards will not vest, will be forfeited in their entirety and no shares of common stock will be delivered. |
Option Modifications
On July 16, 2013, the Board exercised its election to provide that the options granted in August 2012 to each of Dr. Clayman and Dr. Bodick would vest over a four-year period from August 29, 2012. These options were originally granted with a vesting schedule based on the aggregate consideration the Company receives in the event of certain types of corporate transactions or, at the Board’s election in connection with an equity financingspecific termination events. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, except as provided therein, Dr. Bodick is not entitled to any additional compensation, severance or benefits following the Company’s initial public offering, over a four-year period. In addition, in September 2013, the Company and Mr. Driscoll agreed to increase the exercise price of his option granted on May 20, 2013 from $6.59 to $7.89 per share.Separation Date.
Perquisites, Health, Welfare, and Retirement Benefits The NEOs (other than Dr. Bodick) are eligible to participate in the Company’s employee benefit plans, including the Company’s medical, dental, group life, disability and accidental death and dismemberment insurance plans, in each case on the same basis as all of the Company’s other employees. The Company provides a 401(k) plan to its employees, including the NEOs, as discussed in the section below entitled “401(k) Plan.” The Company generally does not provide perquisites or personal benefits to its NEOs, except in certain limited circumstances. The Company does, however, pay the premiums for group term life insurance and long-term disability benefits (and, with respect to long-term disability benefits, the Company provides a tax gross up relating to such payment) for all of the Company’s employees, including the NEOs and the Company pays or reimburses itsthe NEOs for a portion of their health and dental premiums. None of the NEOs participate in qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans sponsored by the Company. None of the NEOs participate in pension plans sponsored by the Company. The Board may elect to adopt qualified or non-qualified benefit plans or pension plans in the future if it determines that doing so is in the Company’s best interests. 401(k) Plan The Company maintains a defined contribution employee retirement plan (“401(k) plan”) for its employees. The Company’s executive officers are also eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan on the same basis as the Company’s other employees. The 401(k) plan is intended to qualify as a tax-qualified plan under Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The plan provides that each participant may contribute up to the lesser of 100% of his or her compensation or the statutory limit, which was $18,000$19,000 for calendar year 2016. Participants that are 50 years or older can also make “catch-up” contributions, which in calendar year 2016 was up to an additional $6,000 above the statutory limit. Effective January 2016, the2019. The Company began making matching cash contributions of 50% on the first 4% of contributions made by participants into the 401(k) plana 3% non-elective match on behalf of all Company participants, including the NEOs. Participant contributions are held and invested, pursuant to the participant’s instructions, by the plan’s trustee. Clawbacks Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
NoneAs a public company, if we are required to restate our financial results due to our material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws as a result of misconduct, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer may be legally required to reimburse our Company for any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation they receive in accordance with the provisions of section 304 of the NEOs participate in or have account balances in non-qualified defined contribution plans or other non-qualified deferred compensation plans maintainedSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Additionally, we intend to implement a Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act-compliant clawback policy to the extent that, the requirements of such clawbacks are finalized by the Company. SEC.
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies Our insider trading policy prohibits all directors and officers from pledging or engaging in hedging or similar transactions in our stock, such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars, puts, calls and short sales.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Year End The Board may elect to providefollowing table shows for the Company’s officers and other employees with non-qualified defined contribution or other non-qualified deferred compensation benefits in the future if it determines that doing so is in the Company’s best interests.fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 certain information regarding outstanding equity awards for our NEOs: | | | | Option Awards(1) | | | Stock Awards | Name | | Grant Date | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options: Exercisable (#) | | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options: Unexercisable (#) | | | Option Exercise Price Per Share(2) ($) | | | Option Expiration Date | | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(3) ($) | Michael D. Clayman, M.D. | | 09/24/2009 | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 0.16 | | | 09/23/2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 08/29/2012 | | | 136,530 | | | | — | | | $ | 2.52 | | | 08/28/2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 03/03/2014 | | | 200,000 | | | | — | | | $ | 17.61 | | | 03/02/2024 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 01/21/2015 | | | 110,000 | | | | — | | (4) | $ | 22.91 | | | 01/20/2025 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 01/04/2016 | | | 151,770 | | | | 3,230 | | (5) | $ | 18.20 | | | 01/03/2026 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/20/2016 | | | 131,250 | | | | 43,750 | | (6) | $ | 18.56 | | | 12/19/2026 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 02/01/2018 | | | 55,903 | | | | 60,764 | | (7) | $ | 22.31 | | | 02/01/2028 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 03/01/2019 | | | — | | | | 290,000 | | (8) | $ | 14.75 | | | 03/01/2029 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 02/01/2018 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21,875 | | (11) | $ | 452,813 | | | | | | Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D. | | 09/24/2009 | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 0.16 | | | 09/23/2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 08/29/2012 | | | 37,472 | | | | — | | | $ | 2.52 | | | 08/28/2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 03/03/2014 | | | 80,000 | | | | — | | | $ | 17.61 | | | 03/02/2024 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 01/21/2015 | | | 45,000 | | | | — | | (4) | $ | 22.91 | | | 01/20/2025 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 01/04/2016 | | | 53,854 | | | | 1,146 | | (5) | $ | 18.20 | | | 01/03/2026 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/20/2016 | | | 32,500 | | | | 32,500 | | (6) | $ | 18.56 | | | 12/19/2026 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 02/01/2018 | | | — | | | | 40,000 | | (7) | $ | 22.31 | | | 02/01/2028 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 03/01/2019 | | | — | | | | 18,000 | | (9) | $ | 14.75 | | | 03/01/2029 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 02/01/2018 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,500 | | (11) | $ | 155,250 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2019 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 36,000 | | (12) | $ | 745,200 | | | | | | Scott Kelley | | 05/02/2016 | | | 26,874 | | | | 3,126 | | (10) | $ | 10.63 | | | 05/01/2026 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/20/2016 | | | 16,500 | | | | 5,500 | | (6) | $ | 18.56 | | | 12/20/2026 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 02/01/2018 | | | 15,973 | | | | 17,360 | | (7) | $ | 22.31 | | | 02/01/2028 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 03/01/2019 | | | — | | | | 18,000 | | (9) | $ | 14.75 | | | 03/01/2029 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 02/01/2018 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,249 | | (11) | $ | 129,354 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2019 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 36,000 | | (12) | $ | 745,200 | | | | | |
(1) | All of the option awards listed in the table above were granted under the 2009 Plan and 2013 Plan, the terms of which are described below under “Equity Benefit Plans.” Except as otherwise indicated, each option award becomes exercisable as it becomes vested and all vesting is subject to the executive’s continuous service with us through the vesting dates. |
(2) | All of the option awards listed in the table above were granted with a per share exercise price equal to the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of grant. For awards granted prior to our initial public offering, the fair market value was determined in good faith by our Board with the assistance of a third-party valuation expert. For awards granted after our initial public offering, the fair market value was determined based on the prevailing market prices of our common stock on the date of grant. |
(3) | The value of restricted stock units shown in the table was calculated using the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2019 ($20.70), the last trading day of 2019. |
(4) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after January 21, 2015, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years. Therefore, these options were fully vested at 2019 fiscal year end. |
(5) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after January 4, 2016, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years. In the event such NEO’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by such NEO for good reason and if such termination occurs within 12 months following a change of control transaction, the option shall accelerate and vest in full. |
(6) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after December 20, 2016, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years. In the event such NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by such NEO for good reason and if such termination occurs within 12 months following a change of control transaction, the option shall accelerate and vest in full. |
(7) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after January 1, 2018, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years. In the event such NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by such NEO for good reason and if such termination occurs within 12 months following a change of control transaction, the option shall accelerate and vest in full. |
(8) | On March 1, 2019, Dr. Clayman was granted 360,000 stock options. 70,000 shares of the 360,000 shares granted were subject to a performance milestone requiring the company to achieve $75 million in sales in 2019, which was not attained. Pursuant to the Option Agreement by and between Flexion and Dr. Clayman dated March 1, 2019, 70,000 of the 360,000 options granted were automatically forfeited and cancelled. Thus, only 290,000 options remain outstanding at December 31, 2019. The remaining 290,000 options vest at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after January 1, 2019, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years. In the event such NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by such NEO for good reason and if such termination occurs within 12 months following a change of control transaction, the option shall accelerate and vest in full. |
(9) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after January 1, 2019, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years. In the event such NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by such NEO for good reason and if such termination occurs within 12 months following a change of control transaction, the option shall accelerate and vest in full. |
(10) | The option vests at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares subject to the option one year after May 2, 2016, with 1/48th of the shares vesting monthly thereafter over the next three years, subject to acceleration in the event Dr. Kelley’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by Dr. Kelley for good reason, in each case within 12 months following a change of control transaction. |
(11) | The restricted stock units vest at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares one year after January 1, 2018 and 1/4th annually thereafter for the next three years until fully vested. |
(12) | The restricted stock units vest at the rate of 1/4th of the total number of shares one year after January 1, 2019 and 1/4th annually thereafter for the next three years until fully vested. |
Equity BenefitBenefit Plans 2013 Equity Incentive Plan The Board adopted the 2013 Plan in August 2013 and outthe Company’s stockholders approved the plan in January 2014. The 2013 Plan became effective in February 2014 in connection with ourthe Company’s initial public offering. Stock Awards.The 2013 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options (“ISOs”), non-statutory stock options (“NSOs”), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, performance-based stock awards and other forms of equity compensation, collectively, stock awards, all of which may be granted to employees, including officers, non-employee directors and consultants of usthe Company and ourits affiliates. Additionally, the 2013 Plan provides for the grant of performance cash awards. ISOs may be granted only to employees. All other awards may be granted to employees, including officers and to non-employee directors and consultants. Share Reserve. As We have currently only granted stock options (including as inducement awards) and restricted stock unit awards under the 2013 Plan, although we may grant other types of March 31, 2017, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock that could be issued pursuant to stock awards under the 2013 Plan was 5,324,731, plus any shares subject to outstanding stock options or other stock awards that would have otherwise returned to our 2009 Plan (such as uponnamed executive officers in the expiration or termination of a stock award prior to vesting). Additionally, the number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under our 2013 Plan automatically increase on January 1 of each year, continuing through and including January 1, 2023, by 4% of the total number of shares of our capital stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year, or a lesser number of shares determined by the Board. The maximum number of shares that may be issued upon the exercise of ISOs under our 2013 Plan is 4,684,989 shares.future.
No person may be granted stock awards covering more than 3,000,000 shares of our common stock under our 2013 Plan during any calendar year pursuant to stock options, stock appreciation rights and other stock awards whose value is determined by reference to an increase over an exercise or strike price of at least 100% of the fair market value on the date the stock award is granted. Additionally, no person may be granted in a calendar year a performance stock award covering more than 3,000,000 shares or a performance cash award having a maximum value in excess of $3,000,000. Such limitations are designed to help assure that any deductions to which we would otherwise be entitled with respect to such awards will not be subject to the $1,000,000 limitation on the income tax deductibility of compensation paid to any covered executive officer imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code.
If a stock award granted under the 2013 Plan expires or otherwise terminates without being exercised in full, or is settled in cash, the shares of our common stock not acquired pursuant to the stock award again will become available for subsequent issuance under the 2013 Plan. In addition, the following types of shares under the 2013 Plan may become available for the grant of new stock awards under the 2013 Plan: (1) shares that are forfeited to or repurchased by us prior to becoming fully vested; (2) shares withheld to satisfy income or employment withholding taxes; or (3) shares used to pay the exercise or purchase price of a stock award. Shares issued under the 2013 Plan may be previously unissued shares or reacquired shares bought by us on the open market. As of March 31, 2017, there were 2,805,232 shares underlying outstanding stock options granted under the 2013 Plan, 189,300 shares underlying unvested restricted stock units granted under the 2013 Plan and 1,523,507 shares remaining available for grant under the 2013 Plan.
Administration. The Board, or a duly authorized committee thereof, has the authority to administer the 2013 Plan. The Board may also delegate to one or more of ourthe Company’s officers the authority to (1) designate employees (other than other officers) to be recipients of certain stock awards and (2) determine the number of shares of common stock to be subject to such stock awards. Subject to the terms of the 2013 Plan, the Board or the authorized committee, referred to herein as the plan administrator, determines recipients, dates of grant, the numbers and types of stock awards to be granted and the terms and conditions of the stock awards, including the period of their exercisability and vesting schedule applicable to a stock award. Subject to the limitations set forth below, the plan administrator will also determine the exercise price, strike price or purchase price of awards granted and the types of consideration to be paid for the award. The plan administrator has the authority to modify outstanding awards under ourthe 2013 Plan. Subject to the terms of ourthe 2013 Plan, the plan administrator has the authority to reduce the exercise, purchase or strike price of any outstanding stock award, cancel any outstanding stock award in exchange for new stock awards, cash or other consideration, or take any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles, with the consent of any adversely affected participant. Stock Options. Incentive and non-statutory stock options are granted pursuant to stock option agreements adopted by the plan administrator. The plan administrator determines the exercise price for a stock option, within the terms and conditions of the 2013 Plan, provided that the exercise price of a stock option generally cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of ourthe Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Options granted under the 2013 Plan vest at the rate specified by the plan administrator. The plan administrator determines the term of stock options granted under the 2013 Plan, up to a maximum of 10 years. Unless the terms of an option holder’s stock option agreement provide otherwise, if an option holder’s service relationship with us,the Company, or any of ourits affiliates, ceases for any reason other than disability, death or cause, the option holder may generally exercise any vested options for a period of three months following the cessation of service. The option term may be extended in the event that exercise of the option following such a termination of service is prohibited by applicable securities laws or ourthe Company’s insider trading policy. If an optionholder’soption holder’s service relationship with usthe Company or any of ourits affiliates ceases due to disability or death, or an optionholderoption holder dies within a certain period following cessation of service, the optionholderoption holder or a beneficiary may generally exercise any vested options for a period of 12 months in the event of disability and 18 months in the event of death. In the event of a termination for cause, options generally terminate immediately upon the termination of the individual for cause. In no event may an option be exercised beyond the expiration of its term. Acceptable consideration for the purchase of common stock issued upon the exercise of a stock option will be determined by the plan administrator and may include (1) cash, check, bank draft or money order, (2) a broker-assisted cashless exercise, (3) the tender of shares of ourthe Company’s common stock previously owned by the optionholder,option holder, (4) a net exercise of the option if it is an NSO and (5) other legal consideration approved by the plan administrator. Unless the plan administrator provides otherwise, options generally are not transferable except by will, the laws of descent and distribution, or pursuant to a domestic relations order. An optionholderoption holder may designate a beneficiary, however, who may exercise the option following the optionholder’soption holder’s death.
Tax Limitations On Incentive Stock Options.The aggregate fair market value, determined at the time of grant, of our common stock with respect to ISOs that are exercisable for the first time by an optionholder during any calendar year under all of our stock plans may not exceed $100,000. Options or portions thereof that exceed such limit will generally be treated as NSOs. No ISO may be granted to any person who, at the time of the grant, owns or is deemed to own stock possessing more than 10% of our total combined voting power or that of any of our affiliates unless (1) the option exercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the stock subject to the option on the date of grant and (2) the term of the ISO does not exceed five years from the date of grant.
Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted stock awards are granted pursuant to restricted stock award agreements adopted by the plan administrator. Restricted stock awards may be granted in consideration for (1) cash, check, bank draft or money order, (2) services rendered to us or our affiliates, or (3) any other form of legal consideration. Common stock acquired under a restricted stock award may, but need not, be subject to a share repurchase option in our favor in accordance with a vesting schedule to be determined by the plan administrator. Rights to acquire shares under a restricted stock award may be transferred only upon such terms and conditions as set by the plan administrator. Except as otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, restricted stock awards that have not vested will be forfeited upon the participant’s cessation of continuous service for any reason.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Restricted stock unit awards are granted pursuant to restricted stock unit award agreements adopted by the plan administrator. Restricted stock unit awards may be granted in consideration for any form of legal consideration. A restricted stock unit award may be settled by cash, delivery of stock, a combination of cash and stock as deemed appropriate by the plan administrator, or in any other form of consideration set forth in the restricted stock unit award agreement. Additionally, dividend equivalents may be credited in respect of shares covered by a restricted stock unit award. Except as otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, restricted stock unit awards that have not vested will be forfeited upon the participant’s cessation of continuous service for any reason. Stock Appreciation Rights. Stock appreciation rights are granted pursuant to stock appreciation grant agreements adopted by the plan administrator. The plan administrator determines the strike price for a stock appreciation right, which generally cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right, we will pay the participant an amount equal to the product of (1) the excess of the per share fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise over the strike price, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of common stock with respect to which the stock appreciation right is exercised. A stock appreciation right granted under the 2013 Plan vests at the rate specified in the stock appreciation right agreement as determined by the plan administrator.
The plan administrator determines the term of stock appreciation rights granted under the 2013 Plan, up to a maximum of ten years. Unless the terms of a participant’s stock appreciation right agreement provides otherwise, if a participant’s service relationship with us or any of our affiliates ceases for any reason other than cause, disability or death, the participant may generally exercise any vested stock appreciation right for a period of three months following the cessation of service. The stock appreciation right term may be further extended in the event that exercise of the stock appreciation right following such a termination of service is prohibited by applicable securities laws. If a participant’s service relationship with us, or any of our affiliates, ceases due to disability or death, or a participant dies within a certain period following cessation of service, the participant or a beneficiary may generally exercise any vested stock appreciation right for a period of 12 months in the event of disability and 18 months in the event of death. In the event of a termination for cause, stock appreciation rights generally terminate immediately upon the occurrence of the event giving rise to the termination of the individual for cause. In no event may a stock appreciation right be exercised beyond the expiration of its term.
Performance Awards. The 2013 Plan permits the grant of performance-based stock and cash awards that may qualify as performance-based compensation that is not subject to the $1,000,000 limitation on the income tax deductibility of compensation paid to a covered executive officer imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code. To help assure that the compensation attributable to performance-based awards will so qualify, ourawards. The Compensation Committee can structure such awards so that stock or cash will be issued or paid pursuant to such award only after the achievement of certain pre-established performance goals during a designated performance period. The performance goals that may be selected include one or more of the following: (1) earnings (including earnings per share and net earnings); (2) earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation; (3) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (4) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and legal settlements; (5) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, legal settlements and other income (expense); (6) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, legal settlements, other income (expense) and stock-based compensation; (7) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, legal settlements, other income (expense), stock-based compensation and changes in deferred revenue; (8) total stockholder return; (9) return on equity or average stockholder’s equity; (10) return on assets, investment or capital employed; (11) stock price; (12) margin (including gross margin); (13) income (before or after taxes); (14) operating income; (15) operating income after taxes; (16) pre-tax profit; (17) operating cash flow; (18) sales or revenue targets; (19) increases in revenue or product revenue; (20) expenses and cost reduction goals; (21) improvement in or attainment of working capital levels; (22) economic value added (or an equivalent metric); (23) market share; (24) cash flow; (25) cash flow per share; (26) share price performance; (27) debt reduction; (28) implementation or completion of projects or processes (including, without limitation, clinical trial initiation, clinical trial enrollment, clinical trial results, new and supplemental indications for existing products, regulatory filing submissions, regulatory filing acceptances, regulatory or advisory committee interactions, regulatory approvals and product supply); (29) user satisfaction; (30) stockholders’ equity; (31) capital expenditures; (32) debt levels; (33) operating profit or net operating profit; (34) workforce diversity; (35) growth of net income or operating income; (36) billings; (37) bookings; (38) the number of users, including but not limited to unique users; (39) employee retention; (40) initiation of phases of clinical trials and/or studies by specific dates; (41) patient enrollment rates; (42) budget management; (43) submission to, or approval by, a regulatory body (including, but not limited to the FDA) of an applicable filing or a product candidate; (44) regulatory milestones; (45) progress of internal research or clinical programs; (46) progress of partnered programs; (47) partner satisfaction; (48) timely completion of clinical trials; (49) submission of investigational new drug applications and NDAs and other regulatory achievements; (50) research progress, including the development of programs; (51) strategic partnerships or transactions (including in-licensing and out-licensing of intellectual property; and (52) to the extent that an award is not intended to comply with Section 162(m) of the Code, other measures of performance selected by the Board.
The performance goals may be based on a company-wide basis, with respect to one or more business units, divisions, affiliates, or business segments and in either absolute terms or relative to the performance of one or more comparable companies or the performance of one or more relevant indices. Unless specified otherwise (i) in the award agreement at the time the award is granted or (ii) in such other document setting forth the performance goals at the time the goals are
established, we will appropriately make adjustments in the method of calculating the attainment of performance goals as follows: (1) to exclude restructuring and/or other nonrecurring charges; (2) to exclude exchange rate effects; (3) to exclude the effects of changes to generally accepted accounting principles; (4) to exclude the effects of any statutory adjustments to corporate tax rates; (5) to exclude the effects of any “extraordinary items” as determined under generally accepted accounting principles; (6) to exclude the dilutive effects of acquisitions or joint ventures; (7) to assume that any business divested by us achieved performance objectives at targeted levels during the balance of a performance period following such divestiture; (8) to exclude the effect of any change in the outstanding shares of our common stock by reason of any stock dividend or split, stock repurchase, reorganization, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination or exchange of shares or other similar corporate change, or any distributions to common stockholders other than regular cash dividends; (9) to exclude the effects of stock based compensation and the award of bonuses under our bonus plans; (10) to exclude costs incurred in connection with potential acquisitions or divestitures that are required to be expensed under generally accepted accounting principles; (11) to exclude the goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges that are required to be recorded under generally accepted accounting principles; (12) to exclude the effect of any other unusual, non-recurring gain or loss or other extraordinary item; and (13) to exclude the effects of the timing of acceptance for review and/or approval of submissions to the FDA or any other regulatory body. In addition, we retain the discretion to reduce or eliminate the compensation or economic benefit due upon attainment of the goals. The performance goals may differ from participant to participant and from award to award.
Other Stock Awards. The plan administrator may grant other awards based in whole or in part by reference to our common stock. The plan administrator will set the number of shares under the stock award and all other terms and conditions of such awards.
Changes to Capital Structure. In the event that there is a specified type of change in our capital structure, such as a stock split or recapitalization, appropriate adjustments will be made to (a) the class and maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2013 Plan, (b) the class and maximum number of shares by which the share reserve may increase automatically each year, (c) the class and maximum number of shares that may be issued upon the exercise of ISOs, (d) the class and maximum number of shares subject to stock awards that can be granted in a calendar year (as established under the 2013 Plan pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code) and (e) the class and number of shares and exercise price, strike price, or purchase price, if applicable, of all outstanding stock awards.
Corporate Transactions. In the event of certain specified significant corporate transactions, the plan administrator has the discretion to take any of the following actions with respect to stock awards: Arrange for the assumption, continuation or substitution of a stock award by a surviving or acquiring entity or parent company. Arrange for the assignment of any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by us to the surviving or acquiring entity or parent company. Accelerate the vesting of the stock award and provide for its termination prior to the effective time of the corporate transaction. Arrange for the lapse of any reacquisition or repurchase right held by us. Cancel or arrange for the cancellation of the stock award in exchange for such cash consideration, if any, as our Board of Directors may deem appropriate. Make a payment equal to the excess of (a) the value of the property the participant would have received upon exercise of the stock award over (b) the exercise price otherwise payable in connection with the stock award. OurThe plan administrator is not obligated to treat all stock awards, even those that are of the same type, in the same manner.
Under the 2013 Plan, a corporate transaction is generally the consummation of (i) a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our consolidated assets, (ii) a sale or other disposition of at least 90% of our outstanding securities, (iii) a merger, consolidation or similar transaction following which we arethe Company is not the surviving corporation, or (iv) a merger, consolidation or similar transaction following which we arethe Company is the surviving corporation but the shares of ourthe Company’s common stock outstanding immediately prior to such transaction are converted or exchanged into other property by virtue of the transaction. Change of Control. The plan administrator may provide, in an individual award agreement or in any other written agreement between a participant and usthe Company that the stock award will be subject to additional acceleration of vesting and exercisability in the event of a change of control. Under the 2013 Plan, a change of control is generally (i) the acquisition by a person or entity of more than 50% of ourthe Company’s combined voting power other than by merger, consolidation or similar transaction; (ii) a consummated merger, consolidation or similar transaction immediately after which ourthe Company’s stockholders cease to own more than 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity; (iii) a consummated sale, lease or exclusive license or other disposition of all or substantially of ourthe Company’s consolidated assets; or (iv) ourthe Company’s complete liquidation or dissolution (or the approval by our stockholdersthe Company’s or the Board of our complete liquidation or dissolution). Amendment and Termination. The Board has the authority to amend, suspend, or terminate ourthe 2013 Plan, provided that such action does not materially impair the existing rights of any participant without such participant’s written consent. No ISOs may be granted after the tenth anniversary of the date theour Board of Directors adopted ourthe 2013 Plan. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan The Board and ourthe Company’s stockholders approved ourthe 2009 Plan, which became effective in September 2009. As of March 31, 2017, there were outstanding stock2009; the 2009 Plan was superseded by our 2013 Plan in connection with the Company’s initial public offering and accordingly, no awards covering a total of 466,882 shares that weremay be granted under our 2009 Plan. No additional awards will be granted under the 2009 Plan and all awards granted under the 2009 Plan that are repurchased, forfeited, expire, are cancelled or otherwise not issued will become available for grant under the 2013 Plan in accordance with its terms. Stock Awards. The 2009 Plan provided for the grant of stock awards, all of which could have been granted to employees, including our officers, non-employee directors and consultants and those of our affiliates. ISOs could only have been granted to employees. All other awards could have been granted to our employees, including our officers, and to our non-employee directors and consultants.
Share Reserve. The aggregate number of shares of our common stock originally reserved for issuance pursuant to stock awards under the 2009 Plan was 1,371,463 shares. The maximum number of shares that could have been issued upon the exercise of ISOs under our 2009 Plan was 2,742,926 shares.
If a stock award granted under the 2009 Plan expires or otherwise terminates without being exercised in full, or is settled in cash, the shares of our common stock not acquired pursuant to the stock award again will become available for subsequent issuance under the 2013 Plan. In addition, the following types of shares under the 2009 Plan may become available for the grant of new stock awards under the 2013 Plan: (1) shares that are forfeited to or repurchased by us prior to becoming fully vested; (2) shares withheld to satisfy income or employment withholding taxes; or (3) shares used to pay the exercise or purchase price of a stock award. Shares issued under the 2009 Plan may be previously unissued shares or reacquired shares bought by us on the open market.
Administration.after such time. The Board, or a duly authorized committee thereof, has the authority to administer the 2009 Plan. OurPlan and awards granted thereunder. The Board had themay also delegate certain authority to delegate to one or more of our officers the authority to (1) designate employees (other than other officers) to be recipients of certain stock awards and (2) determine the number of shares of common stock to be subject to such stock awards. Subject to the terms of the 2009 Plan, our Board or the authorized committee, referred to herein as the plan administrator, determined recipients, dates of grant, the numbers and types of stock awards to beofficers.
Stock Options. Options were granted and the terms and conditions of the stock awards, including the period of their exercisability and vesting schedule applicable to a stock award. Subject to the limitations set forth below, the plan administrator also determined the exercise price, strike price or purchase price of awards granted and the types of consideration to be paid for the award. The plan administrator has the authority to modify outstanding awards under our 2009 Plan. Subject to the terms of our 2009 Plan the plan administrator has the authority to reduce the exercise, purchase or strike price of any outstanding stock award, cancel any outstanding stock award in exchange for new stock awards, cash or other consideration, or take any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles, with the consent of any adversely affected participant.
Stock Options. ISOs and NSOs were granted pursuant to stock option agreements adopted by the plan administrator. The plan administrator determined the exercise price for a stock option, within the terms and conditions of the 2009 Plan, provided that the exercise price of a stock option generally could not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Options granted under the 2009 Plan vest at the rate specified by the plan administrator.
The plan administrator determined the term of stock options granted under the 2009 Plan, up to a maximum of 10 years. Unless the terms of an option holder’s stock option agreement provided otherwise, if an option holder’s service relationship with usthe Company or any of ourits affiliates ceases for any reason other than disability, death or cause, the option holder may generally exercise any vested options for a period of three months following the cessation of service. The option term may be extended in the event that exercise of the option following such a termination of service is prohibited by applicable securities laws or our insider trading policy. If an optionholder’soption holder’s service relationship with us or any of our affiliates ceases due to disability or death, or an optionholderoption holder dies within a certain period following cessation of service, the optionholderoption holder or a beneficiary may generally exercise any vested options for a period of 12 months in the event of disability and 18 months in the event of death. In the event of a termination for cause, options generally terminate immediately upon the termination of the individual for cause. In no event may an option be exercised beyond the expiration of its term. Acceptable consideration for the purchase of common stock issued upon the exercise of a stock option will be determined by the plan administrator and may include (1) cash, check, bank draft or money order, (2) a broker-assisted cashless exercise, (3) the tender of shares of ourthe Company’s common stock previously owned by the optionholder,option holder, (4) a net exercise of the option if it is an NSO and (5) other legal consideration approved by the plan administrator. Unless the plan administrator provides otherwise, options generally are not transferable except by will, the laws of descent and distribution, or pursuant to a domestic relations order. An optionholderoption holder may designate a beneficiary, however, who may exercise the option following the optionholder’soption holder’s death. Tax Limitations On Incentive Stock Options. The aggregate fair market value, determined at the time of grant, of our common stock with respect to ISOs that are exercisable for the first time by an optionholder during any calendar year under all of our stock plans may not exceed $100,000. Options, or portions thereof, that exceed such limit will generally be treated as NSOs. No ISO may be granted to any person who, at the time of the grant, owns or is deemed to own stock possessing more than 10% of our total combined voting power or that of any of our affiliates unless (1) the option exercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the stock subject to the option on the date of grant and (2) the option is not exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date of grant.
Changes to Capital Structure. In the event that there is a specified type of change in our capital structure, such as a stock split or recapitalization, appropriate adjustments will be made to (a) the class and maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2009 Plan, (b) the class and maximum number of shares that may be issued upon the exercise of ISOs and (c) the class and number of shares and exercise price, strike price, or purchase price, if applicable, of all outstanding stock awards.
Corporate Transactions. Unless otherwise provided in the terms of an individual stock award or another written agreement between usthe Company and the holder of a stock award, in the event of certain specified significant corporate transactions, outstanding stock awards may be assumed, continued or substituted for similar stock awards by the surviving or acquiring corporation. If any surviving or acquiring corporation fails to assume, continue or substitute such stock awards, stock awards held by participants whose continuous service has terminated will accelerate vesting in full prior to the corporate transaction and all stock awards will terminate at or prior to the corporate transaction. Under the 2009 Plan, a corporate transaction is generally the consummation of (i) a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of ourthe Company’s consolidated assets, (ii) a sale or other disposition of at least 90% of ourthe Company’s outstanding securities, (iii) a merger, consolidation or similar transaction following which we arethe Company is not the surviving corporation, or (iv) a merger, consolidation or similar transaction following which we arethe Company is the surviving corporation but the shares of ourits common stock outstanding immediately prior to such transaction are converted or exchanged into other property by virtue of the transaction. Change of Control. The plan administrator may provide, in an individual award agreement or in any other written agreement between a participant and us,the Company that the stock award will be subject to additional acceleration of vesting and exercisability in the event of a change of control. All of ourthe Company’s outstanding option agreements with ourthe employees provide for acceleration in full of the stock option if within 12 months after a change of control a participant is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason (which includes a resignation due to assignment of duties or responsibilities that result in a material diminution of function, material reduction in base salary, a relocation of employment by more than 50 miles or a material breach by usthe Company of the terms of the 2009 Plan, option agreement or other material agreement with the company concerning employment). Under the 2009 Plan, a change of control is generally (i) the acquisition by a person or entity of more than 50% of our combined voting power other than by merger, consolidation or similar transaction; (ii) a consummated merger, consolidation or similar transaction immediately after which ourthe Company’s stockholders cease to own more than 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity; (iii) ourthe Company’s complete liquidation or dissolution or approval by the stockholders or ourthe Board of Directors of a plan of complete dissolution or liquidation of us;the Company; or (iv) a consummated sale, lease or exclusive license or other disposition of all or substantially of ourthe Company’s consolidated assets. Amendment and Termination. The 2009 Plan will terminateterminated on September 23, 2019. However, the Board has the authority to amend, suspend, or terminate our 2009 Plan, provided that such action does not materially impair the existing rights of any participant without such participant’s written consent. 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan The Board adopted the 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) in August 2013 and ourthe stockholders approved the ESPP in January 2014. The ESPP became effective in February 2014, in connection with ourthe Company’s initial public offering. The purpose of the ESPP is to retain the services of new employees and secure the services of new and existing employees while providing incentives for such individuals to exert maximum efforts toward our success and that of ourthe Company’s affiliates.
Share Reserve. As of March 31, 2017, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock that could be issued pursuant to purchase rights granted to our employees or to employees of any of our designated affiliates under the ESPP was 955,880 shares. The number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance will automatically increase on January 1 of each calendar year, continuing through January 1, 2023 by the least of (a) 1% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year, (b) 375,768 shares, or (c) a number determined by our Board of Directors that is less than (a) and (b). The ESPP is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the Code. As of March 31, 2017, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock that had been purchased under the ESPP was 80,736 shares and there were 875,144 shares remaining available for purchase under the ESPP.
Administration. The Board has delegated its authority to administer the ESPP to the Compensation Committee. The ESPP is implemented through a series of offerings of purchase rights to eligible employees. Under the ESPP, wethe Company may specify offerings with durations of not more than 27 months and may specify shorter purchase periods within each offering. Each offering will have one or more purchase dates on which shares of ourthe Company’s common stock will be purchased for employees participating in the offering. An offering may be terminated under certain circumstances. Payroll Deductions. Generally, all regular employees, including executive officers, employed by usthe Company or by any of ourits designated affiliates, may participate in the ESPP and may contribute, normally through payroll deductions, up to 15% of their earnings for the purchase of our common stock under the ESPP. Unless otherwise determined by ourthe Board, of Directors, common stock will be purchased for accounts of employees participating in the ESPP at a price per share equal to the lower of (a) 85% of the fair market value of a share of ourthe Company’s common stock on the first date of an offering or (b) 85% of the fair market value of a share of ourthe Company’s common stock on the date of purchase. Limitations. Employees may have to satisfy continuous employment with us or one of our affiliates for a period of time (not to exceed two years) before participating in the ESPP, as determined by the Board. No employee may purchase shares under the ESPP at a rate in excess of $25,000 worth of our common stock based on the fair market value per share of our common stock at the beginning of an offering for each year such a purchase right is outstanding. Finally, no employee will be eligible for the grant of any purchase rights under the ESPP if immediately after such rights are granted, such employee has voting power over 5% or more of our outstanding capital stock measured by vote or value pursuant to Section 424(d) of the Code.
Changes to Capital Structure. In the event that there occurs a change in our capital structure through such actions as a stock split, merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, reincorporation, stock dividend, dividend in property other than cash, large non-recurring cash dividend, liquidating dividend, combination of shares, exchange of shares, change in corporate structure or similar transaction, the Board will make appropriate adjustments to (a) the number of shares reserved under the ESPP, (b) the maximum number of shares by which the share reserve may increase automatically each year and (c) the number of shares and purchase price of all outstanding purchase rights.
Corporate Transactions. In the event of certain significant corporate transactions, including: (i) a sale of all ourthe Company’s assets, (ii) the sale or disposition of 90% of ourthe Company’s outstanding securities, (iii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation where we dothe Company does not survive the transaction and (iv) the consummation of a merger or consolidation where we dothe Company does survive the transaction but the shares of ourits common stock outstanding immediately prior to such transaction are converted or exchanged into other property by virtue of the transaction, any then-outstanding rights to purchase ourthe Company’s stock under the ESPP may be assumed, continued or substituted for by any surviving or acquiring entity (or its parent company). If the surviving or acquiring entity (or its parent company) elects not to assume, continue or substitute for such purchase rights, then the participants’ accumulated payroll contributions will be used to purchase shares of ourthe Company’s common stock within 10 business days prior to such corporate transaction and such purchase rights will terminate immediately. Plan Amendments, Termination. The Board has the authority to amend or terminate ourthe ESPP, provided that except in certain circumstances any such amendment or termination may not materially impair any outstanding purchase rights without the holder’s consent. WeThe Company will obtain stockholder approval of any amendment to ourthe ESPP as required by applicable law or listing requirements.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATIONEquity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 20162019 with respect to shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under its existing equity compensation plans: | | | | | | | | | | (a) | | | (b) | | | (c) | | Plan Category | | Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights | | | | | Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
($) | | | Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a)) | | | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights ($)(2) | | | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | | Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders | | | | | | | | | | Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2009 Equity Incentive Plan | | | 508,882 | | | | (1) | | | | 7.30 | | | | — | | | | 236,187 | | (1) | $ | 2.61 | | | | 0 | | 2013 Equity Incentive Plan | | | 2,759,593 | | | | (1) | | | | 16.92 | | | | 508,781 | | | | 3,692,194 | | (1) | $ | 19.06 | | | | 2,486,093 | | 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,239,901 | | Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders | | | | | | | | | | None | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Inducement awards under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan | | | | 839,560 | | (3) | $ | 17.62 | | | | 587,840 | | Total: | | | 3,268,475 | | | | | | | | 508,781 | | | | 4,767,941 | | | | | | | | 4,313,834 | |
(1) | AllReflects shares issuable upon exercise of options.options and settlement of RSUs. |
(2) | The weighted-average exercise price does not include RSUs, which have no exercise price. |
(3) | In September 2017, to facilitate inducement awards to new hires under Nasdaq listing Rule 5635(c)(4), the Company amended the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan to reserve an additional 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be used for grants to individuals who were not previously employees or non-employee directors of the Company. The 2013 Equity Incentive Plan was amended without stockholder approval pursuant to Rule 5635(c)(4). |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONDirector Compensation
Historically, the Company has not paid cash or equity compensation to directors who are also Company employees for service on the Board. The Company has reimbursed and will continue to reimburse all of its directors for their travel, lodging and other reasonable expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board and committee meetings. The Board has adopted a compensation policy that is applicable to all of the Company’s non-employee directors. TheUntil December 2019, the compensation policy which was subsequently amended in March 2017 as described below, providesprovided that each such non-employee director, other than any non-employee director who disclaims such compensation, will receive the following compensation for service on the Board: An annual cash retainer of $35,000.$45,000 for each director other than for the chairman of the Board; An annual cash retainer of $62,500 for service as chairman of the Board; An additional annual cash retainer of $27,500$10,000 for service as chairmana member of the Board.Audit Committee or $20,000 for service as chair of the Audit Committee; An additional annual cash retainer of $7,500 for service as a member of the AuditCompensation Committee or $15,000 for service as chair of the Audit Committee.Compensation Committee; An additional annual cash retainer of $5,000 for service as a member of the Compensation Committee or $10,000 for service as chair of the Compensation Committee. An additional annual cash retainer of $3,750 for service as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or $7,500$10,000 for service as chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.Committee;
An automatic initial equity grant, upon first joining the Board, of an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, one-third of which vests on the one yearone-year anniversary of grant date and the balance of which vest in a series of 24 equal monthly installments over the second and third year following the grant date.date; and An automatic annual equity grant, for each non-employee director whose term continues on the date of the Company’s annual meeting each year, of an option to purchase 12,500 shares of ourthe Company’s common stock (with respect to all non-employee directors other than the chairman of the Board) or 18,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (with respect to the chairman of the Board), in each case vesting in equal monthly installments over one year following the grant date. Each of the option grants described above will (i) vest in full upon a change inof control (as defined under theour 2013 Plan), (ii) have a 10 year10-year term and (iii) be granted under the 2013 Plan, the terms of which are described in more detail above under “Equity Benefit Plans—2013 Equity Incentive Plan.” The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the compensation of our non-employee directors and making recommendations to the Board about any changes to such compensation. In March 2017, upon the recommendationFollowing a review of the Compensation Committee, the Board revised our non-employee director compensation policy in order to align our directors’ compensation more closely with the compensation paid to directors at our peer group companies. As a result,December 2019, the Board (i) increasedmade the following changes: Increased the annual cash retainer from $35,000 to $40,000 (other$50,000 for each director other than for the chairman of the Board), (ii) increasedBoard; Increased the additional annual cash retainer to $67,500 for service as a memberchairman of the Audit Committee from $7,500Board; Increased the automatic initial equity grant, such that upon first joining the Board, a director will be granted an option to $10,000, or from $15,000 to $20,000 for service as chairpurchase 32,000 shares of the Audit Committee; (iii) increasedCompany’s common stock, one-third of which vests on the additionalone-year anniversary of grant date and the balance of which vest in a series of 24 equal monthly installments over the second and third year following the grant date; Decreased the amount of options granted under the automatic annual cash retainer for service as a memberequity grant such that each director whose term continues on the date of the Compensation Committee from $5,000Company’s annual meeting each year will be granted an option to $7,500, or from $10,000 to $15,000 for service as chairpurchase 7,000 shares of the Compensation Committee and (iv) increasedCompany’s common stock (with respect to all directors other than the additional annual cash retainer for service as a memberchairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from $3,750 to $5,000,Board) or from $7,500 to $10,000 for service as chair12,500 shares of the NominatingCompany’s common stock (with respect to the chairman of the Board), in each case vesting in equal monthly installments over one year following the grant date; and Corporate Governance Committee. Added RSUs to the automatic annual equity grant, such that each director whose term continues on the date of the Company’s annual meeting each year will be granted 4,500 RSUs, vesting in full on the one year anniversary following the date of grant. Each of the option grants and RSUs described above will (i) vest in full upon a change of control (as defined under our 2013 Plan) and (ii) be granted under the 2013 Plan, the terms of which are described in more detail above under “Equity Benefit Plans—2013 Equity Incentive Plan.” Further, each of the option grants described above will have a 10-year term.
The following table shows for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019 certain information with respect to the compensation of all non-employee directors of the Company: DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONFOR FISCAL 2016
| Name(1) | | Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($) | | | Option
Awards
($)(3) | | | | | | All Other
Compensation
($) | | | | | Total
($) | | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | | | Option Awards(3) ($) | | | All Other Compensation ($) | | | Total ($) | | Patrick J. Mahaffy | | | 76,250 | | | | 248,940 | | | | (4) | | | | — | | | | | | 325,190 | | | | 75,000 | | | | 131,305 | | (4) | | — | | | | 206,305 | | Scott A. Canute | | | 38,750 | | | | 172,875 | | | | (5) | | | | 5,500 | | | | (12) | | | | 217,125 | | | | 50,000 | | | | 91,184 | | (5) | | — | | | | 141,184 | | Samuel D. Colella | | | 47,500 | | | | 172,875 | | | | (6) | | | | — | | | | | | 220,375 | | | | 62,500 | | | | 91,184 | | (6) | | — | | | | 153,684 | | Heath Lukatch, Ph.D. | | | 40,938 | | | | 172,875 | | | | (7) | | | | — | | | | | | 213,813 | | | Heath Lukatch, Ph.D.(2) | | | | — | | | | — | | (7) | | — | | | | — | | Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M. | | | 50,000 | | | | 172,875 | | | | (8) | | | | — | | | | | | 222,875 | | | | 65,000 | | | | 91,184 | | (8) | | — | | | | 156,184 | | Ann Merrifield | | | 42,500 | | | | 172,875 | | | | (9) | | | | — | | | | | | 215,375 | | | | 55,000 | | | | 91,184 | | (9) | | — | | | | 146,184 | | Alan W. Milinazzo | | | 42,500 | | | | 172,875 | | | | (10) | | | | — | | | | | | 215,375 | | | | 60,000 | | | | 91,184 | | (10) | | — | | | | 151,184 | | Mark Stejbach(2) | | | 10,462 | | | | 97,568 | | | | (11) | | | | — | | | | | | 108,030 | | | Mark Stejbach | | | | 55,000 | | | | 91,184 | | (11) | | — | | | | 146,184 | |
(1) | Dr. Clayman was an employee director during 20162019 and therefore did not receive any compensation in 20162019 for services provided as a member of the Board. Dr. Clayman’s compensation as an executive officer is fully reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table” above. |
(2) | Mr. Stejbach joinedDr. Lukatch disclaimed the Board on September 13, 2016.cash compensation and option awards that he was eligible to receive for being a non-employee director in 2019. |
(3) | Amounts reflect the grant date fair value of option awards granted, as computed in accordance with ASC 718.authoritative accounting guidance. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162019 for the assumptions used to determine the valuation of stock option awards. |
(4) | Represents the grant date fair value associated with an option to purchase 18,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $13.83$11.74 per share. As of December 31, 2016,2019, Mr. Mahaffy held options to purchase an aggregate of 84,824108,000 shares of our common stock. |
(5) | Represents the grant date fair value associated with an option to purchase 12,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $13.83$11.74 per share. As of December 31, 2016,2019, Mr. Canute held options to purchase an aggregate of 39,50077,000 shares of our common stock. |
(6) | Represents the grant date fair value associated with an option to purchase 12,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $13.83$11.74 per share. As of December 31, 2016,2019, Mr. Colella held options to purchase an aggregate of 30,50068,000 shares of our common stock. |
(7) | As of December 31, 2019, Dr. Lukatch held options to purchase an aggregate of 34,000 shares of our common stock. |
(8) | Represents the grant date fair value associated with an option to purchase 12,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $13.83$11.74 per share. As of December 31, 2016, Dr. Lukatch2019, Mr. Mahatme held options to purchase an aggregate of 21,50077,000 shares of our common stock. |
(8)(9) | Represents the grant date fair value associated with an option to purchase 12,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $13.83$11.74 per share. As of December 31, 2016, Mr. Mahatme2019, Ms. Merrifield held options to purchase an aggregate of 39,50077,000 shares of our common stock. |
(9)(10) | Represents the grant date fair value associated with an option to purchase 12,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $13.83$11.74 per share. As of December 31, 2016, Ms. Merrifield2019, Mr. Milinazzo held options to purchase an aggregate of 39,50086,450 shares of our common stock. |
(10)(11) | Represents the grant date fair value associated with an option to purchase 12,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $13.83$11.74 per share. As of December 31, 2016, Mr. Milinazzo held options to purchase an aggregate of 48,950 shares of our common stock. |
(11) | Represents the grant date fair value associated with an option to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $15.87 per share. As of December 31, 2016,2019, Mr. Stejbach held options to purchase an aggregate of 25,00062,500 shares of our common stock. |
(12) | Represents consulting fees for services provided to the Company during 2016 pursuant to a consulting agreement. |
Transactions with Related Persons TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONSANDINDEMNIFICATION
RELATED-PERSON TRANSACTIONS POLICYAND PROCEDURESRelated-Person Transactions Policy and Procedures
The Company has adopted a written related-person transactions policy that sets forth the policies and procedures regarding the identification, review, consideration and oversight of “related-person transactions.” For purposes of the Company’s policy only, a “related-person transaction” is a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which the Company and any “related person” are participants involving an amount that exceeds $120,000. Transactions involving compensation for services provided to the Company as an employee, consultant or director are not considered related-person transactions under this policy. A related person is any executive officer, director or a holder of more than 5% of our common stock, including any of their immediate family members and any entity owned or controlled by such persons. Under the policy, where a transaction has been identified as a related-person transaction, management must present information regarding the proposed related-person transaction to the Audit Committee (or, where review by the Audit Committee would be inappropriate, to another independent body of the Board) for review. The presentation must include a description of, among other things, the material facts, the direct and indirect interests of the related persons, the benefits of the transaction to the Company and whether any alternative transactions are available. To identify related-person transactions in advance, the Company relies on information supplied by its executive officers, directors and certain significant stockholders. In considering related-person transactions, the Audit Committee or other independent body of the Board takes into account the relevant available facts and circumstances including, but not limited to the: Risks, costs and benefits to the Company.Company; Impact on a director’s independence in the event the related person is a director, immediate family member of a director or an entity with which a director is affiliated.affiliated; Terms of the transaction.transaction; Availability of other sources for comparable services or products.products; and Terms available to or from, as the case may be, unrelated third parties or to or from the Company’s employees generally. In the event a director has an interest in the proposed transaction, the director must recuse himself or herself from the deliberations and approval. CERTAIN RELATED-PERSON TRANSACTIONSCertain Related-Person Transactions
There have been no transactions since January 1, 20162018 to which the Company has been a party, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeded $120,000, or if less, 1% of the average of the Company’s total assets as of December 31, 2018 and 2019, and in which any of the Company’s directors, executive officers or, to ourthe Company’s knowledge, beneficial owners of more than 5% of ourthe Company’s capital stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than equity and other compensation, termination, change inof control and other arrangements, which are described elsewhere in this proxy statement. INDEMNIFICATIONOF OFFICERSAND DIRECTORSIndemnification of Officers and Directors
The Company has entered into, and intends to continue to enter into, separate indemnification agreements with its directors and executive officers, in addition to the indemnification provided for in the Bylaws. These agreements, among other things, require the Company to indemnify its directors and executive officers for certain expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by a director or executive officer in any action or proceeding arising out of their services as one of the Company’s directors or executive officers or any other company or enterprise to which the person provides services at the Company’sour request. The Company believes that these bylaw provisions and indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and Bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their fiduciary duties. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors and officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit the Company and its stockholders. A stockholder’s investment may be harmed to the extent the Company pays the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions.
HOUSEHOLDINGOF PROXY MATERIALSHouseholding of Proxy Materials
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or other Annual Meetingannual meeting materials with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or other Annual Meetingannual meeting materials addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies. This year, a number of brokers with account holders who are Flexion stockholders will be “householding” the Company’s proxy materials. A single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be “householding” communications to your address, “householding” will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive a separate Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, please notify your broker or if your Flexion shares are registered in your own name, please contact Flexion’s transfer agent, Computershare, by calling them at 800-733-5001 or writing them at Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 30170, College Station, TX 77842.broker. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials at their addresses and would like to request “householding” of their communications should contact their brokers or if your Flexion shares are registered in your own name, please contact Flexion’s transfer agent, Computershare, by calling them at800-733-5001 or writing them at Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 30170, College Station, TX 77842. brokers.
OTHEROther MATTERSatters
The Board knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting.annual meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the annual meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. By Order of the Board of Directors 
| | Mark S. Levine | Corporate Secretary |
April 29, 2020 A copy of the Company’s Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019 is available without charge upon written request to: Corporate Secretary, Flexion Therapeutics, Inc., 10 Mall Road, Suite 301, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803. 
ANNUAL MEETING OF FLEXION THERAPEUTICS, INC.
| | | Date:
| | Thursday, June 22, 2017
| Time:
| | 1:30 P.M. (Eastern Time)
| Place:
| | Marriott Hotel, 1 Burlington Mall Road, Burlington, MA 01803 |
Flexion Transformative Medicine... Where It Matters Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 Time: 12:00 P.M. (Eastern Time) Place: www.proxydocs.com/FLXN TO ATTEND the annual meeting, please visit www.proxydocs.com/FLXN for virtual meeting registration details and register no later than JUNE 8, 2020 at 5:00 P.M. Eastern Time to receive your unique live meeting link to access the meeting. Please make your marks like this: ☒È Use dark black pencil or pen only The Board of Directors Recommends a VoteFOReach of the director nominees listed in proposal 1, andFOR proposal 2. | | | | | 1:
| | To elect three Class III directors to hold office until the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.
| Nominees:
| | | | | (01) Heath Lukatch, Ph.D.
| | | | | (02) Patrick J. Mahaffy
| | | | | (03) Alan W. Milinazzo
| | |
| | | | | Vote For
All Nominees
| | Withhold Vote From
All Nominees
| | Vote For
All Except
| ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ |
| | | INSTRUCTIONS:To withhold authority to vote for any nominee, mark the “Vote For All Except” box and write the number(s) in the space provided to the right. | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For | | Against | | Abstain | | | 2:
| | To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.
| | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | | | | | | | To attend the meeting and vote your sharesin person, please mark this box. | | | | ☐ | | | | | | | | | | | | | Authorized Signatures - This section must becompleted for your Instructions to be executed. | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Please Sign Here | | | | Please Date Above | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Please Sign Here | | | | Please Date Above | | | | | Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on your stock certificate. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the proxy.
|
|  Please separate carefully at the perforation and return just this portion in the envelope provided. |
2, and FOR proposal 3. 1: To elect three Class III directors to hold office until the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders. Nominees: (01) Heath Lukatch, Ph.D. (02) Patrick J. Mahaffy (03) Alan W. Milinazzo Vote For All Nominees Withhold Vote From All Nominees Vote For All Except INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any nominee, mark the “Vote For All Except” box and write the number(s) in the space provided to the right. 2: To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. For Against Abstain 3: To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. For Against Abstain Authorized Signatures - This section must be completed for your Instructions to be executed. Please Sign Here Please Date Above Please Sign Here Please Date Above Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on your stock certificate. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the proxy. Please separate carefully at the perforation and return just this portion in the envelope provided. Flexion Transformative Medicine... Where It Matters Annual Meeting of Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. to be held on Thursday,Wednesday, June 22, 2017 10, 2020 for Holders as of April 24, 2017 13, 2020 This proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | VOTE BY: | | | | | | |  INTERNET | | | | | |  TELEPHONE |
| | | | | | | | | | | Go To
| | | | | | | | Call | www.proxypush.com/flxn
| | | | | | | | 866-291-6836 |
| | | | | | | | | | | • | | Cast your vote online 24 hours a day/7 days a week.
| | | | OR | | • | | Use any touch-tone telephone toll-free 24 hours a day/7 days a week.
| •
| | Have your Proxy Card/Voting Instructions Form ready.
| | | |  MAIL
| | •
•
| | Have your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form ready.
Follow the simple recorded instructions.
| •
| | View Meeting Documents.
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | OR | | • | | Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form.
| | | | | • | | Detach your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form.
| | | | | | | • | | Return your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form in the
| | | | | | | | | postage-paid envelope provided.
| | |
VOTE BY: INTERNET Go To www.proxydocs.com/FLXN Cast your vote online 24 hours a day/7 days a week. Have your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form ready. View Meeting Documents. OR TELEPHONE Call 866-291-6836 Use any touch-tone telephone toll-free 24 hours a day/7 days a week. Have your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form ready. Follow the simple recorded instructions. OR Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form. Detach your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form. Return your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form in the postage-paid envelope provided. The undersigned hereby appoints Michael D. Clayman, M.D. and Neil Bodick,Mark S. Levine, and each or either of them, as the true and lawful attorneys of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and revocation, and authorizes them, and each of them, to vote all the shares of common stock of Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at said meeting and any adjournment thereof upon the matters specified and upon such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, conferring authority upon such true and lawful attorneys to vote in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting and revoking any proxy heretofore given. THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, SHARES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTIONEACH OF THE DIRECTORSDIRECTOR NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEMPROPOSAL 1, AND FOR THE PROPOSAL IN ITEM 2.PROPOSALS 2 AND 3. THE PROXIES WILL VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING AND ANY ADJOURNMENT THEREOF. All votes must be received by PLEASE VOTE BY 11:59 P.M., Eastern Time, June 21, 2017.EASTERN TIME, JUNE 9, 2020. PROXY TABULATOR FOR FLEXION THERAPEUTICS, INC. c/o MEDIANT COMMUNICATIONS P.O. BOX 8016 CARY, NC 27512-9903
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PROXY TABULATOR FOR
FLEXION THERAPEUTICS, INC.
c/o MEDIANT COMMUNICATIONS
P.O. BOX 8016
CARY, NC 27512-9903
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | EVENT #
CLIENT #
Flexion Transformative Medicine... Where It Matters Proxy for Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, June 10, 2020 This proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors Please vote, date and sign this Proxy on the other side and return it in the enclosed envelope. The Stockholder signing on the reverse side (the “undersigned”), having received the Annual Report and Proxy Statement, hereby appoint(s) Michael D. Clayman, M.D. and Mark S. Levine, and each of them, Proxies of the undersigned (with full power of substitution) to attend the Annual Meeting of Flexion Therapeutics (the “Company”) to be held on Wednesday, June 10, 2020, and all adjournments and postponements thereof (the “Meeting”), and to vote all shares of Common Stock of the Company that the undersigned would be entitled to vote, if personally present, in regard to all matters that may properly come before the Meeting. The undersigned hereby confer(s) upon the Proxies, and each of them, discretionary authority to consider and act upon such business, matters or proposals as may properly come before the Meeting. This Proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner specified herein. If no specification is made, the Proxies intend to vote FOR all nominees for director in Proposal 1 and FOR proposals 2 and 3. Please separate carefully at the perforation and return just this portion in the envelope provided. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|